CC_Minutes_1956_0912 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Village of Roseville :Regul~ meeting o~ the Village Council Wedn~sday, September J2, 1956 .'.Phal· e VJ.dallage CouncilKil)let onHthe above date WJ.th the follow:iJll;t members present.. Sa ver , Carlson, tts, éJmmersten and McGee. Attorney Rooert Gear:ln and Engineers Ed Bather and Chas. Soutter were also present. Carlson Moved, McGee Seconded the minutes of the September 4 Council meeting Minutes pe accepted aspresented. Roll Call Ayes (5)-N8lfes (0). ;An amendment to Section No.1, OrlÜnance No. 216 was prepared by Robert Gearin Ordinance ",ccording to the Council's request. Amended /,:~Gee Moved, Salverda Seconded the amendment to Section No.1, Ordinance 216 . be adopted. Roll CaJ.l Ayes (J)-Hayes (2)-Carlson and Hammersten opposed. The plat of Hamline Heights wAD taken up and Ed Bather reported that his inspec- Hamline tion of the plat shows a high-, water table in the area· insufficient drain~e Heights structures and waterways, and the recommendation was that no further develop- ment be permitted at this time. The Clerk was instructed to notify the owner of the plat that final acceptance of the plat will be held up until a plan is submitted which will satisfy the Village in relation to drainage. .A hear~ was held on the p~oposed rezoning from farm residential to Class A -residentJ.al described legally as follows: Lots 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22~ 23, 24~ 25, 36, 37, 38, & 39 in St. Paul Park Addition and part of lot 20 descrived as follows: The Nt of that part of Lot 26 in St. Paul Park lying East of a line parallel with and distant 1213.1 feet East of theWest line of the NWi of Section 2, Township 29, Range 23. The sl of that part of Lot 26 in St. Paul Park lying East of a line parallel with and distant 1213.1 feet East of the West line of the NWi of Section 2, Township 29, Range 23. The N ~ of the S ~ of that part of Lot 26 St. Paul Park lying East of a line .I'1JJ';ll'ling parallel with and distant 1213.1 feet East of the W line of the NWt of-Section 2, Township 29, Range 23. The Planning Commission recommended that this property be rezoned to Class A -residential because of the stead;y development of this area into residential sites, their values will be consJ.derably more protected by such zoning class- ifications. ;Francis Pearso!}6nd Earl Bailey appeared in favor of the rezoning. Hammersten Moved, Carlson Seconded the above deser:ibed property be rezoned from Farm residential to Class A residential. Roll Call Ayes (4)-Nayes (1)- Salverda opposed. A hearing was held for the proposed rezoning from farm residential to buSiness Tor lots 5 and 6, block 1, Rochat's Addition, located near the southeast corner of Cleveland and County Road liD". The Planning Commission is of the unanimous opinion that the request for 't"ezoning be denied as the rezoning would not be in conformance with the comprehensive plan which has been drawn up by the Planning Consultant. Mrs. Rochat reported that a building has been used there for aany years for ~::an egg business~ but has been used for a cabinet shop for about two years ~'which she rents out and is her only means of income. She was told the. t the same conditions could continue, but she could not sell the building for business. . Mrs. H. Rosenquist reported that when she was approched with the petition, it was stated that the property would be rented and not sold. :Hr. Ben Mertens said that the rezoning has come up for the purpose of continuing a cabinet shop and that he was pJ:esent at the time the petition was discussed and that no rental or :1B ase entered the conversàtion. Don Charles, operator of the cabinet shop asked if he could continue operating his business there if the property is not rezoned. He was told that if the property is sold, a cabinet ship cannot be operated there. Rezoning Propo~ed Rezðro.ng , .-'1 )~j 'j!,~ ~ ;,..J