My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2024_0513
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2024
>
CC_Minutes_2024_0513
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/6/2024 4:48:40 PM
Creation date
6/6/2024 4:48:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/13/2024
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,May 13, 2024 <br /> Page 8 <br /> Councilmember Schroeder indicated with a commission the City does a <br /> background check on the member and asked if a committee, does the City need to <br /> do a background check. <br /> City Attorney Tierney thought that was a decision that the Council could make. <br /> Councilmember Schroeder thought one of the reasons for a background check was <br /> because the Commissioners were involved with youth. <br /> City Attorney Tierney noted that was a good point and thought the City might want <br /> to do a little research about it. Her instinct is that there may be a way to avoid the <br /> background check. But,the other consideration of the background check is that the <br /> City wants to be careful about what kind of information is shared with the <br /> commissions and that can become an independent reason to want a background <br /> check. <br /> Mayor Roe asked if the City established this by a resolution and in the resolution, <br /> there is information about how business is done. If it starts to look a lot like a <br /> Commission, he asked will it then be subject to the open meeting law and other <br /> things. <br /> City Attorney Tierney explained to start with some of the Commissions' work may <br /> not actually be legally required to be subject to the open meeting law. The City <br /> would need to be careful about the responsibilities that the Council assigned to the <br /> Commission. Based on the description, she did not think the Council would need <br /> to make this committee subject to the open meeting law. Again, the City would <br /> want to be careful about the level of responsibility that the committee is given. The <br /> Council would then explicitly state that the committee is not subject to the open <br /> meeting law and would also make sure there is some level of transparency built into <br /> the structure of the commission. <br /> Councilmember Groff understood people think that Zoom is great,and a lot of work <br /> can be done there, but he did not feel that way. He thought Zoom was distancing <br /> and hard to read what someone else is thinking or feeling because when the Council <br /> used Zoom for its meetings, he was not able to see body language or have those <br /> interactions. So, for him,having a total Zoom Commission would be the beginning <br /> of the end of this. <br /> Ms. Olson reviewed a hybrid group format with the City Council. She noted it <br /> would be in a committee format with ten members, two of them youth, and there <br /> would be improved transparency where the meetings would be announced with <br /> agendas and meeting minutes. <br /> Mr. Montez explained staff wanted to have the best of both models with <br /> transparency, flexibility, and accessibility. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.