CC_Minutes_1956_1107 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Village of Roseville Regular meeting of the Village Council ¡.Jednesday, November 7, 19.56 2 PM The Village Council met on the above date with the following members present. Sklverda, Cé'rlson, Kitts, HamJn.ersten, and NcGee. Attorney Robert Gearin and Engineer Biarles Soutter were also present. Bather - late. Kitts excused 2:30 PM. Kitts Moved, H~mé,rsten Seconded the minutes of October 23, be accepted as presented. Roll Call Ayes (5)-Nayøs (0). ß. H. Loftsgaarden ap:P3 ared in T100half of property owner:: to the South of the proposed vacating of Asbury Street South of County Road C-2.A:'maphe submitted explained how these property mmers 'would be affected by the vacating. Asmury Street is needed in the development of their property. P~ter Eopovich was present in behalf of School District #38 and reported that the school wi.shes to have an Eas~est access.. Neil Wood represented Centennial Î'Iethodist Church iíi favor of the proposed vacating. Ie stated that a duplication of streets 95 feet apart is uneconom- ical and unessential. Kitts Moved, Hammersten Seconded the ~atter be continued until the differences áre worked out. Roll Call Ayes (5)-Nayes (0). '---- ~fue rezoning of a 7-acre tract of lmld owned by the Sunset Memorial Association 1-TaS brought up for hearing. No one appeared in opposition to the rezoning. The The Planning Comrnission recommended the petition be granted. Hammersten Moved, CaDIson Seconded the petition for rezoning be granted for the fOllowing desc.ribed pro12ert'J._ Roll _Cal~_Ayes C5}-Na.:ves CoL. * The rezoning of the following described propert,y from residential to business was brought up for hearing. The S 282.34 ft. jf the E 259.44 ft. of Lot 34, Thorntonls Subdivision of the NE~ of Section 13, T 29, R 23. subject to rights acquired by Ramsey County for road purposes, except that portion of said property which is alreaqy zoned for business. l'k> one appeared in objection to the rezoning. The Planning Commission recommended that the petition be granted and that the sideyard which adjoins the residential lot to the west be not less than 10 feet in width, and shall not contain parking or loading facilities. Under our present zoning ordinance the required setback in this case would be 5 feet and no stipulation as to park- ing or loadine;. dammersten Moved, Carlson Seconded the petition be granted subject to the recom- "'lendation of the Planning Gomrilission. Roll Call Ayes (4)-Nayes (0). Hæm~er8ten Moved, Carlson Seconded preliminaIJT approval be granted subject to the layout as presented with regard to the plat of Anderson & Erickson. Roll C21l Ayes (4)-Nayes (0). The Clerk read a letter from the Roseville Businessmen IS AE;sociation stating that a resolution adopted on October 16, 19S6 in relation to the Comprehensive Village Plan does not seem to be cßar with respect to intent and the'map, exhibit "A". They requested that the Jletter be referred to the Village Attorney, and that a written legal clarificat\OI}1r..t.at~g wheth~r the map marked. e~ibit II~" to the resolution passed by the Counciltfl6, ~s a zon~ng map or a prelJ.mll1ary gu~de map and if it was made a part of the resolution in itl s entirety. It Has also -~----~-"-...-._..._-_._._-- --- - . ~-_._.__._._---- +- TnRt, n;:;rt of the North'rTest :1)) ~).rt.er of S,,"ction " Tmmship 29 t Vacating of Asbury St. Rezoning Rezoning Anderson & Erickson