My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 06032024
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2024
>
CCP 06032024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2024 10:46:53 AM
Creation date
7/5/2024 10:45:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
6/3/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
246
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />The Morris Leatherman Company <br />May 2024 <br />higher 89.3%, well within the top 10% of summary ratings in the Metropolitan Area. Over 90% <br />rate fire protection, emergency medical services, sewer and water, building inspections, animal <br /> control and code enforcement as either “excellent” or “good.” Eighty-nine percent favorably rate <br />police protection and drainage and flood control. Key reasons for giving services an unfavorable <br /> rating include “poor patrolling,” at 31%, “flooding,” at 18%, “loose animals,” at 16%, and “poor <br /> taste of water,” at 11%. Between 79% and 89% similarly rate street repair and maintenance, <br />snow plowing, trail and pathway plowing in parks, trail and pathway plowing in neighborhoods, <br />pathway repair and maintenance in the parks and pathway repair and maintenance in <br />neighborhoods. The lowest rated service remains street repair and maintenance at 79%, which is <br />a seven percent increase from the 2020 study. This service rating is now well above the <br />Metropolitan Area norm of 60%. <br />Property Taxes: <br />Roseville residents remain tax sensitive during the past four years. Forty-six percent think their <br /> property taxes are “high” in comparison with neighboring suburban communities, while 45%, a <br /> 10% increase in four years, see them as “about average.” Eighty-five percent, an eight percent <br /> increase, view city services as either an “excellent” or a “good” value for the property taxes paid; <br />this endorsement level now places Roseville within the top decile of Metropolitan Area suburbs. <br />While 57% of the sample, a seven percent increase from the 2020 level, would support an <br />increase in their city property taxes to maintain city services at their current level, thirty-seven <br />percent, also a seven percent increase, would oppose an increase under these circumstances. <br />Solid majorities endorse the City continuing to invest in long-term infrastructure projects. By a <br />94%-5% margin, residents support investing in city roads. An 86%-13% majority favors <br />investments in water and sewer pipes, and a 77%-21% majority feels the same about city <br />buildings. An 80%-19% majority is in favor of continued investment in pedestrian pathways, and <br />a 75%-24% majority endorses continued investments in bikeways. Overall, the average change <br />in support in comparison with the 2020 study is an insignificant -2.7%, reflecting the stable <br />consensus in favor of long-term investments during the past four years. <br />4 <br />Qbhf!66!pg!357 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.