Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The Morris Leatherman Company <br />May 2024 <br />Sales Tax Referendum: <br />Respondents were reminded that Minnesota cities and counties are permitted to ask for <br />legislation to permit a public vote on an increase in the local sales tax to pay for improvements <br />that are regionally significant. The sales tax is assessed in the same way as the state sales tax, <br />exempting items such as clothes and groceries. During the 2023 legislative session, the City of <br />Roseville was given permission to hold a sales tax referendum this November for the <br />construction of a Public Works and Parks and Recreation Maintenance Facility and a new license <br />and passport center. Fifty-six percent report awareness of the November sales tax referendum. <br />They were told the City will ask voters to approve two questions for a new local half-cent sales <br />tax increase for up to 20 years. The sales tax would expire once the approved projects are fully <br />funded. <br />By a 69%-24% majority, residents support the referendum for the construction of a Public Works <br />and Parks and Recreation Maintenance Facility. Strong support outnumbers strong opposition by <br /> a 13%-5% margin. Supporters base their decision on “reasonable cost,” “like instead of property <br /> tax increase,” and “needed.” Opponents base their verdict on “current inflation and economy,” <br /> “no more tax increases of any kind,” and “not needed.” <br />They were informed a second referendum question would be required to allow the funds from <br />the same half-cent sales tax increase to be used to build a new license and passport center. There <br />would not be a second half-cent sales tax increase if this referendum question passes. <br />By a 66%-29% majority, residents support the referendum for the construction of a new license <br />and passport center. Strong support outnumbers strong opposition by a 14%-7% margin. <br /> Supporters again base their decision on “reasonable cost,” “like instead of property tax increase,” <br /> “needed.” Opponents base their verdict on “current inflation and economy” and “not <br /> needed.” <br />Next, respondents were read three statements and asked if each one would affect their decisions. <br /> The table below shows the statement, followed by the percentage of respondents who are “more <br /> likely” to support the referenda, “less likely” to support the referenda,” and “makes no <br /> difference” to them. <br />5 <br />Qbhf!67!pg!357 <br /> <br />