My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 06032024
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2024
>
CCP 06032024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2024 10:46:53 AM
Creation date
7/5/2024 10:45:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
6/3/2024
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
246
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />The Morris Leatherman Company <br />May 2024 <br />Conclusions: <br /> <br />As in the 2020 study, the key issues in 2024 facing decision-makers is addressing perceptions <br /> about “rising crime,” particularly “drugs,” “youth crimes and vandalism,” and “automobile <br /> break-ins and theft.” Unlike other suburbs, concerns about crime in Roseville have not seriously <br />eroded the high levels of approval and support for the quality of life, fiscal management of the <br />community, direction of the city, tax tolerance, government job ratings, and sense of community. <br />So far, the City has done a comparatively good job tempering the concern about crime. Since <br /> 48% rate “safety” as the most important aspect of city’s future quality of life, “crime”— together <br /> with its prevention and reduction – should continue to be given a high place in the discussion of <br /> issues, policies, and resource allocation. Additionally, worries about “speeding traffic” and <br /> “more police patrolling” will need to be discussed and a framework for policy goals considered. <br />While perceptions of city property taxes have worsened across the Greater Metropolitan Area <br />suburbs, the general hostility is far more moderate in Roseville than the regional trend would <br />suggest. Even so, it should be considered a more limiting factor in using additional funds to <br /> maintain and augment services. While 46% still see their property taxes as “high,” this is nine <br />percent lower than the current suburban average. A corresponding seven percent increase in the <br />number of residents willing to increase their property taxes to maintain city services, indicates <br />residents are more tolerant to a discussion of additional funding to continue to provide city <br />services at their current level. It is also a testament to the high ratings city services are granted. <br />The proposed sales tax referenda are in the most curious position MLC has encountered this <br />year. The 69% and 66% support levels do not deviate significantly among all demographic <br />groups. Since 2024 is a presidential year, turnout will be at its usual maximum level. Only two <br />demographic groups register even high levels of support: households containing 18-24 year olds, <br />and residents in the Southeast or Southwest quadrant of the community. The major <br />communications challenge facing supporters is to aggressively inform voters that the second <br />question does not request approval of another half-cent sales tax increase. In addition, as always, <br /> another challenge will be to make sure voters know the referenda are on the ballot – a surprised <br />voter usually votes against a referendum. <br />Community development efforts should continue to focus on helping seniors stay in the <br />community and provide younger adults options to move into the city. Moderate concerns <br />continue about assisted living opportunities for seniors. This perception is in line with the very <br />high levels of commitment to staying in the city if residents moved from their current homes. <br /> The parks and recreation system remains the “crown jewel” in the City’s quality of life. Usage is <br />still higher than expected viewed against the demography of the community. Park buildings and <br />the newer Cedarholm Community Building are very well-received by the public. Trails and <br />10 <br />Qbhf!72!pg!357 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.