My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-06-04_PR_Comm_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Packets
>
2024
>
2024-06-04_PR_Comm_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2024 1:42:00 PM
Creation date
8/1/2024 1:41:45 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />41 Staff reminded the Commission of their role for Park Dedication, which is to review the <br />42 proposed development in relation to the parks and recreation system plans and goals, and to <br />43 make a recommendation on whether the City should accept land, cash, or a combination thereof <br />44 to satisfy the Park Dedication requirement. <br />45 <br />46 The developer was present at the meeting to answer any questions from the Commission. No <br />47 questions were asked. <br />48 <br />49 Commissioner J. Arneson relayed that he would support cash in lieu of land as the parcel does <br />50 not abut existing parkland. <br />51 <br />52 Commissioner Dahlstrom moved to recommend cash ($8,500), in lieu of land, to satisfy <br />53 Park Dedication for 210 County Road B2 to the City Council. Vice-Chair Beckman <br />54 seconded. <br />55 <br />56 Roll Call <br />57 Ayes: A. Arneson, J. Arneson, Beckman, Boulton, Brown, Dahlstrom, Kooistra, Matts- <br />58 Benson, Penny, Raygor. <br />59 Nays: None. <br />60 Abstain: None. <br />61 <br />62 b)PARKS AND RECREATION MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE REQUEST FOR <br />63 PROPOSAL UPDATE <br />64 Staff explained that the City currently uses Active.net for its Recreation Management Software <br />65(RMS) needs, and has done so since 2005. Additionally, staff relayed that both customers and <br />66 staff have discussed the need to review what RMS options are available for the City. <br />67 <br />68 Introduction <br />69 o ActiveNet – Current RMS Software <br />70 Organize programs <br />71 Schedule facilities <br />72 Manage finances <br />73 Facility Scheduling and Reservations <br />74 Interface that community members use to review program offerings online, <br />75 register for a program online, or reserve a facility online. <br />76 o Last reviewed software in February 2005 <br />77 o Request for Proposal <br />78 Challenges of Current Software <br />79 o Complaints from customers, hard to navigate <br />80 o Facility reservation options are limited <br />2 <br />Qbhf!5!pg!48 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.