My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 09232024
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2024
>
CCP 09232024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2024 3:54:23 PM
Creation date
9/27/2024 3:54:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
9/23/2024
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
234
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Date: 9/23/2024 <br />Item No.: 10.e. <br />Department Approval City Manager Approval <br /> <br />Item Description: Approve Resolution Awarding Contract for the Dale-Owasso Sanitary <br />Sewer Lift Station Project <br />1 <br />2 Background <br />3 The Dale-Owasso Sanitary Sewer Lift Station has been identified in the City’s capital <br />4 replacement plan for rehabilitation. Bolton & Menk, Inc., was retained to develop plans and <br />5 specifications needed to reconstruct this lift station. The rehabilitation work was advertised <br />6 and bids were received on September 12, 2024. <br />7 <br />8 Overall Best Value procurement was used for this project. We received 3 proposals for this <br />9 work and have reviewed and scored them utilizing the Best Value format. Bidders submit <br />10 technical information about their experience and available equipment, which is scored by <br />11 Roseville staff and our engineering consultant, Bolton & Menk, Inc. The Best Value process <br />12 then uses a formula to adjust the bid price by dividing by the aggregate average technical <br />13 score as a percentage based on a high score of 100. The following are the three <br />14 contractors who submitted proposals, their best value technical scores, the adjusted cost, <br />15 and Best Value ranking: <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />Page 1 of 3 <br />Qbhf!332!pg!345 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.