My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024_1022_PWETC_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
202x
>
2024
>
2024_1022_PWETC_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/21/2024 3:45:16 PM
Creation date
10/21/2024 3:41:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/22/2024
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
34 <br />35 5. Metro Transit Update <br />36 Public Works Director Jesse Freihammer introduced Cindy Harper, Ben Bakon, <br />37 and Berett Clausen from Metro Transit, who presented the Metro Transit update. <br />38 <br />39 Member Mueller indicated that the presentation touched upon the routes that are <br />40 being discontinued, and she wondered what Metro Transit was doing with park- <br />41 and -ride sites like Route 272 from Rice Street. <br />42 <br />43 Ms. Harper stated the park -and -ride will stay open. The G line will serve it, as will <br />44 Route 270, which is the express service from Maplewood Mall to Hwy 36 into <br />45 downtown Minneapolis. <br />46 <br />47 Member Rudolf explained that her job encompasses transit and land use and <br />48 encounters people across the country who make decisions about those matters. She <br />49 found that people who ride transit speak about it differently than people who do <br />50 not. She wondered if Metro Transit has ways to distinguish riders from non -riders <br />51 regarding the feedback offered as it solicits feedback on its plan. <br />52 <br />53 Ms. Harper explained that their survey comment form asks some demographic <br />54 questions and asks how often the person rides transit. They are interested in all <br />55 feedback, particularly on the local routes. Those riders tend to come from <br />56 underrepresented communities that will not attend a public meeting or have <br />57 conversations about this. Metro Transit is also working with a consulting firm to <br />58 help target those underrepresented groups with specific events and working within <br />59 the communities to get the word out about what Metro Transit plans on doing. <br />60 <br />61 Member Fergus thought it was interesting that Ms. Harper noted the change in <br />62 ridership during morning and evening rush hours. These were both at the same <br />63 level, and he wondered who was riding in the evening. <br />64 <br />65 Ms. Harper reviewed the current ridership with the Commission. <br />66 <br />67 Member Luongo indicated that Route 62 has been fare -free for a <br />68 while and wondered if that impacted ridership. <br />69 <br />70 Ms. Harper explained that two routes, Route 32 and Route 62, both of which serve <br />71 Roseville, are currently fare -free on the pilot program. She indicated they <br />72 were unsure if they would return to charging fares or what would happen once the <br />73 program expires. She explained that ridership has increased on both routes, which <br />74 is higher than the percentage seen across other routes. One exciting thing is it is <br />75 free to board either of those two routes, but if a transfer is needed, there is still afee <br />76 for that, and the only customers who are getting an utterly fare -free ride are those <br />77 who do not have to transfer. <br />78 <br />79 Chair Ficek asked how long the pilot program will run. <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />Page 4 of 78 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.