My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 01132025
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2025
>
CCP 01132025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 12:18:50 PM
Creation date
1/29/2025 12:18:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
1/13/2025
Meeting Type
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />126 considered as the local sales tax cannot be used. Staff, working with Bond Counsel Mary Ippel, <br />127 have identified three potential options: <br />128 1. Port Authority General Obligation Bonds <br />129 2. Economic Development Authority Revenue Bonds <br />130 3. City Revenue Bonds <br />131 In 2011, the City, using its port authority powers, issued $27 million in bonds to implement the parks <br />132 improvement plan and construct a new fire station. The final payment of $2,485,500 for these bonds <br />133 will be fully paid off in 2028 using 2027 levy funds. As a result, $2,485,500 of existing levy funds <br />134 will be available to use towards new debt payments for the LPC as part of the 2028 budget. <br />135 <br />136 Regarding the cost of constructing a new LPC, the current estimate is approximately $12 <br />137 million. As this estimate includes about $6 million for contingencies, soft costs, and inflation, it <br />138 would be appropriate to have an updated cost estimate for a new LPC prior to issuing debt. <br />139 <br />140 Ms. Ippel has prepared a memo detailing the differences between each financing option (Attachment <br />141 3). In brief, here is a summary of each option: <br />142 <br />143 Port Authority General Obligation (G.O.)Bonds <br />144 The City of Roseville was granted “port authority” powers as defined under State Statutes under <br />145 state legislation approved 1987. As a result, the City can utilize their port authority to issue general <br />146 obligation bonds. These bonds can be issued without the submission of the question of issuing bonds <br />147 to the electors of the City. There are some procedural steps that need to be taken that are outlined in <br />148 Ms. Ippel’s memo. The bonds are payable through property taxes collected by the City. The City <br />149 can reduce the amount of taxes needed to pay the bond by an amount equal to the revenues derived <br />150 from the project (i.e. from the License and Passport Center). So, with this option, the bond could be <br />151 paid back by a combination of property taxes and LPC revenue. <br />152 <br />153 Economic Development Authority (EDA) Revenue Bonds <br />154 The Roseville EDA could issue revenue bonds to construct the LPC. The City would then lease the <br />155 new facility from the EDA with the annual lease amount equal to the annual debt payment of the <br />156 EDA revenue bond. Property taxes can be used for the lease payment. Like the Port Authority G.O. <br />157 Bond, a combination of property taxes and revenue from the LPC can be put towards the lease to pay <br />158 back the EDA bond. Any revenue bond will have a higher interest rate than a G.O. Bond. Revenue <br />159 bonds can be issued without holding a local referendum. <br />160 <br />161 City Revenue Bonds <br />162 The City can issue revenue bonds payable solely from the net revenues of the LPC project. As the <br />163 net revenues of the LPC may not be sufficient to pay the annual debt service of the bond, it is most <br />164 likely not feasible to issue a city revenue bond. Like the EDA Revenue Bond, a city revenue bond <br />165 will have a higher interest rate, and can be issued without holding a local referendum. <br />166 <br />167 Question #4 At this point, does the City Council have a preferred type of financing to construct <br />168 the new License and Passport Center? <br />169 <br />170 Based on City Council direction, staff will bring back further discussion regarding the preferred <br />171 financing of the LPC. <br />172 <br />Page 4 of 9 <br />Qbhf!8!pg!6: <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.