My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 01272025
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2025
>
CCP 01272025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 12:22:08 PM
Creation date
1/29/2025 12:21:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
1/27/2025
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
252
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment 2 <br />38 necessarily ready to adjust its zoning or restrictions on this particular item for the Council to <br />39 make a snap decision. She agreed with Commissioner Bauer in that regard. Getting more <br />40 public input before the Council decides would be nice. She also agreed with Planning <br />41 Commissioner McGehee’s comments. <br />42 Councilmember Etten noted Shoreview’s ordinance is significantly more prescriptive. He <br />43 went through some of the requirements in the ordinance. He said a lot more in the Shoreview <br />44 ordinance that gives staff structure from which to work. He indicated he would not be <br />45 prepared to vote on some of this, and he thought staff should be looking at some of these <br />46 other ordinances and how the City can more richly consider this and provide more structure, <br />47 not necessarily for these exact billboards but maybe for some of the other ones that may have <br />48 more impact. <br />49 If needed, Mayor Roe thought this item should be tabled to a non-specific time so that the <br />50 City Council can discuss it further. <br />51 Ms. Gundlach indicated that the applicant has agreed to extend the review period by sixty <br />52 days. This will give staff time to revise the Ordinance, submit it to the Planning Commission <br />53 for a public hearing, and then return it to the City Council in February 2025. <br />54 Etten moved, and Strahan seconded, to table this item for review and amendment by staff <br />55 and the City Council. <br />56 Roll Call <br />57 Ayes: Etten, Schroeder, Groff, Strahan, and Roe. <br />58 Nays: None <br />Qbhf!84!pg!363 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.