Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment 4 <br />Member McGehee asked if Clear Channel could turn them off at night. <br />Mr. Weiland indicated Clear Channel could, but that's not how we operate the signs. With the <br />signs we have now, the existing static signs are lit all night long. The other thing he added <br />was that he did have a lot of thoughts on some of the issues raised that have come up before <br />in our industry. Dynamic signs have louvers, and plastic louvers direct the light towards the <br />road and what needs to be seen. So they do reduce light as you look above them, as you get <br />to the side of the signs or above them, you don't see anything, much like a TV screen, but <br />yeah, they'll get to a point when you're too the side of my sign, it's entirely on. It's going to <br />look black to you because of the way the louvers are, and as you get above them, it's going to <br />look like the signsare not even on because of the louvers in with the LEDs. <br />Member McGehee asked if Mr. Weiland knew of any data regarding bird migration that <br />could be looked up. <br />Mr. Weiland indicated he did not. He explained that Clear Channel operates the same signs <br />across the country, but he was not aware of any information regarding that. <br />Mr. Paschke noted that at the interstates where these signs are located, all are heavily lit, <br />blending in with that. He understood the extra light noise, if you will, and those types of <br />things. And then, as it relates to only starting with one out of the five, the code doesn't <br />preclude any other business from having a dynamic sign. And so, I'm not sure limiting the <br />billboards was necessarily advantageous. The amendments to the code for dynamic signs <br />must be much more dramatic than just the billboards if the City wants to limit or reduce noise <br />or light pollution. <br />Member McGehee indicated she remembered the City getting a lot of complaints when the <br />dynamic sign on County Road C went in—speaking of dynamic signs on County Road C, <br />between Rose Lawn and B, for the church there. <br />Mr. Paschke indicated he did not remember getting a lot of complaints on that sign. He <br />remembered getting complaints from the one on Larpenter Avenue, which used to be North <br />Como, now its New life Presbyterian. There were some complaints from the residents on that <br />one, which mostly had to do with them not getting the setup correct. And so it took them a <br />while to work with the light company and not have people tinker with the light and other <br />things for the electronics that monitor and regulate the sign. And then I believe there was <br />another sign-off of Cleveland Avenue further south, where we had a similar issue, but that <br />Qbhf!98!pg!363 <br /> <br />