My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 02102025
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2025
>
CCP 02102025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2025 2:55:42 PM
Creation date
2/11/2025 2:55:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
2/10/2025
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Date: 2/10/2025 <br />Item No.: 10.i. <br />Department Approval City Manager Approval <br /> <br /> <br />Item Description: Accept 2024 Body-Worn Camera Audit Report <br />1 <br />2 Background <br />3 The Roseville Police Department (RPD) retained Lynn Lembcke Consulting to conduct an independent <br />4 audit of RPD’s Body-Worn Camera (BWC) policy. The audit covered the period from October 1, 2022, <br />5 through November 30, 2024. Under Minnesota State Statute §13.825, subd. 8, law enforcement <br />6 agencies that utilize body-worn cameras are required to conduct a biennial audit to ensure compliance <br />7 with the requirements outlined in Minn. Stat. §13.825 and Minn. Stat. §626.8473. Additionally, the law <br />8 mandates that the results of the audit be provided to the City Council and the Legislative Commission on <br />9 Data Practices and Personal Data Privacy (Minn. Stat. §13.825, subd. 9c). <br />10 <br />11 RPD has been utilizing body-worn cameras since 2017, following the receipt of a grant from the United <br />12 States Bureau of Justice. Before implementation, as required by law, the department solicited public <br />13 input at a hearing on November 27, 2021. Independent audits of RPD’s body-worn camera program <br />14 were previously conducted in 2020 and 2022. <br />15 <br />16 The recent audit identified one minor discrepancy related to a recent change in state law. The new law <br />17 requires that officers assigned a body-worn camera must wear and operate the system in compliance <br />18 with their agency’s policy, even when performing law enforcement duties under the command of another <br />19 chief law enforcement officer. While this was already was standard practice at RPD, it was not explicitly <br />20 stated in the department’s policy manual. Upon learning of this policy requirement, RPD immediately <br />21 updated its policy to include the necessary language and is now in full compliance with all statutory <br />22 requirements. No other discrepancies were noted during the audit. <br />23 <br />24 Policy Objectives <br />25 One of the City’s aspirations is to be a community where all people feel safe and secure, and where trust <br />26 and mutual respect for police, fire, and all emergency responders are fostered. To build and maintain <br />27 this trust, it is essential that the Roseville Police Department (RPD) remains transparent in its policies <br />28 and practices. Conducting independent audits of the department’s body-worn camera program is a <br />29 critical component in achieving this goal. <br />30 <br />31 To ensure compliance with state laws and to uphold RPD’s commitment to transparency and <br />32 accountability, an independent audit of the department’s body-worn camera program was conducted, <br />33 with the results provided to the City Council. Additionally, RPD’s policy on body-worn cameras is publicly <br />34 posted on the department’s website, reinforcing its commitment to open and accessible policing <br />35 practices. <br />36 <br />37 Equity Impact Summary <br />38 The Roseville Police Department (RPD) is committed to fostering a culture of transparency and <br />39 accountability to strengthen public trust and legitimacy, particularly among communities that have <br />40 historically experienced mistrust or injustices in their interactions with law enforcement. Conducting an <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />Qbhf!23:!pg!264 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.