My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 02242025
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2025
>
CCP 02242025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2025 10:03:48 AM
Creation date
2/25/2025 10:03:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
2/24/2025
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
243
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, May 13, 2024 <br />Page 14 <br />Councilmember Schroeder thought the point was that the City would start there. <br />Councilmember Etten wondered why the City did not start with a committee and if it did <br />not work, then it could be more constrained in the commission format. <br />Councilmember Schroeder thought the Council was talking about all of the different <br />variables at once and that is what made her think about this a little bit. <br />Councilmember Etten thought if this goes to a commission format, then there should not <br />be any exceptions so there would be zero variable changes. <br />Mayor Roe agreed, other than doing a more overarching look at some of the open meeting <br />law questions related to all of the Commissions. <br />Councilmember Groff thought the purpose would change. <br />Councilmember Etten agreed but explained none of the other variables would change. <br />Mayor Roe thought a case could be made that a lot of the issues the City has had with the <br />Commission has been because the City Code confuses people with too many things and <br />everyone has a different perspective on what the Commission should be doing. If the issue <br />is solved, perhaps that is the thing the Council needs to do. He thought the Council still <br />needed to ensure all of the commissions in the City do not look the same as the City <br />Council. He wondered if the Council needed to go to two-year terms for all commissions. <br />He noted that was just to make a point. He asked if there was consensus on how the Council <br />will take the next step, to build it around the existing commission structure. <br />Councilmember Strahan indicated the name has changed along with the focus of the <br />Commission. <br />Mayor Roe noted the name has not changed yet. <br />Councilmember Strahan thought Human Rights has not been talked about at all and is <br />probably not a part of this group. She thought this was an internal focused group that is <br />advisory to the Council. This is a different type of focus that is being asked of the group. <br />She thought that was a lot of variables right there that have been changed and the Council <br />can come back in six months to discuss and review this. <br />Ms. Olson explained current commissions are advisory to the City Council. She asked if <br />this was changed to include staff also so would this Commission be expected to provide <br />recommendations rather than reviewing and providing feedback because other <br />Commissions are providing recommendations. She noted that changes some of the scope <br />and duties that have been talked about. <br />Qbhf!213!pg!354 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.