Laserfiche WebLink
The public right-of-way is currently encumbered by public utilities that accommodate existing <br />sanitary sewer and storm sewer infrastructure, as well as private utilities such as the overhead electric <br />that extends along the full-length of the eastern boundary of the corridor. These utilities and required <br />easements will remain in place regardless of whether the right-of-way is vacated or retained. <br />The 30-foot easterly portion of the corridor is densely wooded, with numerous mature trees that <br />would be affected by any pathway development. The informal path currently in use traverses both <br />the now known private property and this wooded area but is not improved, maintained, or part of the <br />2021 Pathway Master Plan. <br />While a 30-foot right-of-way currently exists, a formal pathway typically requires a 20-foot wide <br />easement in order to properly maintain the improvement. If a pathway were installed, the right-of- <br />way would still be vacated after the improvement was installed and a pathway easement would be <br />retained through the vacation process. This would be similar to other vacations the city has approved <br />since 2022 where existing, formal pathways existed. <br />________________________________________ <br />5. Constructability Analysis <br />The existing conditions of the Aldine Street corridor, while not ideal for immediate pathway <br />installation, do present an opportunity to construct an improved pathway. The corridor is mostly flat <br />and lies within a 30-foot-wide right-of-way corridor that could facilitate the construction of a <br />pathway. However, several challenges must be considered for pathway installation. <br />First, the only alignment that can be considered is within the 30 feet of the right-of-way platted with <br />Mid Oaks, and not in areas where the pathway meanders into private property unless easements are <br />granted by those property owners. The construction of an improved path would require the removal <br />of trees, many of which are large and mature. Staff conducted a tree survey of size and count within <br />this portion of right-of-way, seen in the table below. Tree classification, or the species of trees, was <br />not determined during this survey. <br />Size - - - <br />Quantity 32 10 9 1 8 2 2 2 <br />The removal of these trees could generate concern regarding the loss of canopy and neighborhood <br />aesthetic. While it is unknown how many trees would ultimately be impacted without a formal <br />be anticipated <br />to be impacted. <br />In terms of construction, the pathway would need to meet the standards of the 2021 Pathway Master <br />Plan for off-road paths and its considerations for accessibility, e.g. requiring an improved surface such <br />as concrete or bituminous. Additionally, an appropriate width that accommodates both pedestrian and <br />potentially cyclist traffic (multimodal) must be considered. While the 2021 Pathway Master Plan <br />identifies widths that vary between 6-12 feet, the typical minimum width is 8 feet to accommodate <br />multimodal use, with a 12 feet width being the maximum. This would involve grading throughout <br />the corridor to ensure a proper base section for the pathway while also maintaining adequate drainage, <br />with more impactful grading near Roselawn Avenue W in order to match the existing grade of the <br />!Qbhf!4! <br />Qbhf!55!pg!464 <br /> <br />