My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 07072025
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2025
>
CCP 07072025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/8/2025 12:34:48 PM
Creation date
7/8/2025 12:34:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
7/7/2025
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
377
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />52 employee cost of living adjustments (COLA) and wage steps, healthcare increases, <br />53 contractual obligations & professional services, and general inflationary costs. Non-union <br />54 staff will continue to advance through their wage steps as part of the new compensation <br />55 system. At this time, a 3% COLA is anticipated to be factored into the budget for non-union <br />56 employees to match existing union contracts. Union members that have existing contracts <br />57 going into 2026 will receive the wage adjustments and COLA contained in their contracts. <br />58 With regard to other union contracts, the following contracts expire at the end of 2025: <br />59 Police Officers and Firefighters. We expect wage adjustments for each union to be <br />60 included in the 2026 budget. Additional tax levy support for capital improvement funds will <br />61 also be included in the 2026 budget. <br />62 <br />63 The City Manager has met with each department to review their specific budget needs and <br />64 will be focusing on refining those requests into his proposed budget which will be presented <br />65 to the City Council on August 25, 2025. <br />66 <br />67 In addition to the tax levy impacts noted above, continued emphasis on our water, sanitary <br />68 sewer, and storm sewer infrastructure replacement programs is expected to drive utility rate <br />69 increases for 2026 as well. More specific information regarding budgetary impacts will be <br />70 addressed with the release of the 2026 City Manager's Recommended Budget in August <br />71 and the utility rates later this fall. <br />72 <br />73 Staff is seeking specific direction from the City Council on budget priorities for the 2026 <br />74 budget cycle. This discussion is essential to ensure that the City Manager’s proposed <br />75 budget aligns with the Council’s goals and provides clarity on how to approach service level <br />76 expansions and financial constraints. <br />77 <br />78 To help frame this discussion and ensure staff is focusing efforts in the right areas, we are <br />79 seeking initial guidance from the Council on several key issues. While no final decisions are <br />80 being made at this stage, your input will help shape the development of the preliminary <br />81 budget and ensure it reflects your priorities. The questions below are intended to prompt <br />82 discussion and surface early direction as we navigate what is expected to be a particularly <br />83 challenging budget year. <br />84 <br />85 Public Safety Staffing Requests: <br />86 Given the significant staffing requests from Police and Fire, does the Council have <br />87 initial guidance on whether to consider full implementation in 2026 or take a phased <br />88 approach over multiple years? <br />89 Are there factors—such as external funding, workload analysis, or service level <br />90 impacts—that you would like staff to evaluate further as part of this conversation? <br />91 Service Level Prioritization: <br />92 As we consider how to balance potential staffing additions with overall budget <br />93 constraints, are there service areas or initiatives you believe should remain a high <br />94 priority — or conversely, areas that could be considered a lower priority in 2026 if <br />95 tradeoffs are necessary? <br />96 Are there any services that you feel should be protected or prioritized regardless of <br />97 budget pressures? <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />Qbhf!81!pg!488 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.