Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment 1 <br />RYIWSPI�ffi� <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Approval <br />Description: Receive Update on Civic Campus Master Plan <br />1 BACKGROUND <br />Date: June 16, 2025 <br />Item No.: <br />City Manager Approval <br />2 At the March 17, 2025 City Council meeting, the Council approved a Professional Services <br />3 Agreement for Architectural Services with BKV Architects (BKV) to determine if there is a less <br />4 costly option for the License/Passport Center & Dance Studio (LPCDS) than the current plan <br />5 identified in the Civic Campus Pre -Design Study (CCPDS). Major tasks in the agreement included <br />6 the following: <br />7 • Provide an updated cost estimate for the proposed LPCDS which is proposed in the <br />8 CCPDS. <br />9 • Provide an updated cost estimate for the Maintenance Operations Center (MOC) as <br />10 proposed in the CCPDS. <br />11 • Provide a cost estimate for a single story LPCDS instead of the two-story plan. <br />12 • Provide feasibility options to reuse portions of the existing Maintenance Facility (MF) for <br />13 LPCDS use. <br />14 • Provide feasibility options to reuse portions of the existing Maintenance Facility for other <br />15 uses such as office space, restaurant, or event venue use. <br />16 • Provide report and presentation to Council. <br />17 • Provide facility assessment of existing Maintenance Facility buildings. <br />18 Scope Verification: Staff worked with BKV and their sub -consultants to review program usage, <br />19 conduct a facility assessment and look at options identified in the scope as well as a few additional <br />20 options. The only change to program usage was the LPC whose needs increased from 8,700 GSF to <br />21 10,400 GSF due to growth in LPC operations since 2021. This increased scope increases costs for <br />22 this facility in the proposed new estimates and alternatives. <br />23 Facility Assessment: The facility assessment rating conducted indicated that the 2003 garage is in <br />24 fair condition and could be feasible for reuse or to remodel. The north and east garages are in fair to <br />25 poor conditions and would be less cost-effective to re -use or remodel. The report indicates that if all <br />26 three buildings continue to be used "as is," more than $3.7 million in improvements would be <br />27 needed over the next 10 years. <br />28 Updated Costs & Concepts: The consultant provided updated cost estimates of the existing CCPDS <br />29 and other concepts that were developed with the scope. The costs shown are estimates and are <br />30 intended to show worst case scenarios for costs and to accommodate the unknown risks at this time <br />31 in the design process, which is industry standard. The costs are broken down into hard costs and soft <br />32 costs. Hard costs include construction costs, escalation to 2027 midpoint construction using 4% <br />33 inflation per year, design contingency (for changes in the design process, manage unknowns, <br />Page 1 of 3 <br />Page 28 of 64 <br />