My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2025-09-02_PR_Comm_Min
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Minutes
>
2025
>
2025-09-02_PR_Comm_Min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/8/2025 3:00:02 PM
Creation date
10/8/2025 3:00:02 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
prevent tree loss if roots are disturbed. Ms. Quinn also referenced recent City Communications <br />celebrating an award for natural resources management, which highlighted the importance of <br />preservation. <br />She urged the Commission to prioritize saving both the mature trees and the privacy of the <br />abutting neighbors, who did not expector want to live next to a park. <br /> <br /> O. Gault,2021 Herschel St. <br />O. Gault, 2021 Herschel Street, spoke in favor of retaining the path. She noted that she walks the <br />path year-round and, although it has never been shoveled, neighbors continue to use it in the <br />winter. She emphasized that residents are not asking for anything new but simply want to <br />continue using the existing walking path, which she has relied on for the 30 years she has lived <br />in the neighborhood. <br />Ms. Gault explained that she was unaware until the initial vacate notice that some abutting <br />property owners did not want people walking on the ROW. In response to the closing of the path <br />she created an on-linepetition, and within one week it received 98 signatures representing 68 <br />households, all supporting the continuation of the path. <br /> <br />She expressed regret that the issue has become divisive between abutting homeowners and the <br />rest of the neighborhood. However, she emphasized her hope that both the path and the <br />greenspace can be preserved. <br /> <br /> D. Urswell,1731 Shryer <br />D. Urswell, 1731 Shryer Avenue, spoke in favor of preserving the path. She expressed concern <br />for children living on Mid Oaks, noting that without the path they cannot move between <br />neighborhoods without running across busy streets. She emphasized that the path has served as a <br />well-established neighborhood connection for more than 30 years and that it is unfair to isolate <br />children by removing it. <br /> <br />Ms. Urswell stated that children should have the opportunity to take the healthier route of <br />walking along the path, rather than being forced to rely on motor vehicles to travel between <br />neighborhoods or access local community amenities. <br /> <br /> J. Pribyl, 1738 Skillman Ave. <br />J. Pribyl, 1738 Skillman Avenue, spoke in support of the path. He stated that he enjoys using the <br />path and appreciates that this unique situation is being given thoughtful and creative <br />consideration. He noted that the path serves as a connector between neighborhoods as well as to <br />the University of Minnesota agricultural fields, which welcome walkers and providesa large <br />open space for recreation that his family takes advantage of often. <br />Mr. Pribyl also highlighted the importance of the trees, noting that they have long existed <br />alongside and within the ROW. He expressed appreciation that everyone’s input is being <br />considered and that the process has allowed neighbors to hear and understand each other’s <br />perspectives. <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.