2025-09-02_PR_Comm_Min - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

A. Quinn, 89 Mid Oak A. Quinn, 89 Mid Oaks Lane, emphasized that the situation has changed since he purchased his home. He noted that the size of the right-of-way has decreased over time and that there have been concerns with unwanted activity in the area. He also pointed out that portions of the existing path are located on private property, meaning the path cannot remain in its current location and would need to change. He added that any changes would affect the trees and observed that everyone seems to be in agreement about the importance of preserving them. The Commission acknowledged that there are valid points on both sides of the issue. Commissioners emphasized the importance of protecting the privacy of adjacent neighbors while also recognizing the value of maintaining neighborhood connections to parks and trails. The Commission discussed and agreed that the ROW provides Parks and Recreation value, noting that this has been acknowledged historically as the Parks and Recreation Master Plan identified the right-of-way segment as a potential “constellation link.” Commissioners also discussed whether the property would be best classified as a park or as a right-of-way, and how that decision could impact the preservation of trees. In addition, the Commission considered how future property ownership changes could affect both the neighborhood and its natural resources. Commissioner Donaldson moved to recommend to the City Council that the Parks and Recreation Commission acknowledges that the Aldine right-of-way has value for the Parks and Recreation System. Commissioner Kooistra seconded. Roll Call Ayes: Beckman, Botzek, Donaldson, Harris, Kooistra, Matts-Benson, Penny. Nays: None. Abstain: Her. The Commission discussed potential options for moving forward with a recommendation to the City Council, emphasizing that tree preservation should remain a top priority. Commissioners agreed that a non-traditional pathway would be the most favorable option, as it would have the least impact on the trees, unless a detailed study determined that the existing trees are not viable. Chair Matts-Benson moved that the Parks and Recreation Commission recommends that the City Council direct staff to, as expeditiously as possible, engage with a third party to conduct a detailed study of a non-traditional path that includes: 1. Pathway alignment options and, 2. Specific tree impacts and that a final decision be made immediately following the receipt of the study. Vice- Chair Beckmann seconded. 7