Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT 2 <br />Minneapolis went through to adopt similar language into ordinance (MPLS 83.10 subp.10). If this <br />earlier adoption is not allowed, is there an appeal process? Can you also address how long it would <br />take on your end to get through a process to allow earlier adoption or to undergo an appeal? If it is <br />easier to discuss by phone, my supervisor Janice Gundlach and I are available at your convenience. <br />While Janice and I do not see the “geological condition” allowed for as an exception, we would like to <br />have as much information as possible to bring back to the Council. <br />I really appreciate the time you have taken with this, <br />Dave <br />Dave Englund | Building Official <br />Community Development Department <br />Phone: 651.792.7087 <br />david.englund@cityofroseville.com <br />2660 Civic Center Drive | Roseville, MN 55113 <br />Facebook | Twitter | YouTube <br />From: Metz, Greg (DLI) <greg.metz@state.mn.us> <br />Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2025 11:26 AM <br />To: David Englund <david.englund@cityofroseville.com> <br />Subject: FW: City adoption of deleted Residential Code Sections <br />Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution. <br />Good morning Dave, <br />Just as a follow up, the Residential Building Code Technical Advisory Group heard and approved to <br />move forward with a code change proposal adding section R401.5 to the Minnesota Residential <br />Code in 2026. <br />R401.5 Excavation near foundations. Where excavation will reduce support from any adjoining <br />public or private property foundation, a registered design professional shall prepare an assessment <br />of the structure as determined from examination of the structure, the review of available design <br />documents and, if necessary, excavation of test pits. The registered design professional shall <br />Qbhf!22!pg!322 <br /> <br />