CCP 09222025 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Attachment 1 the added public safety personnel. (Scenarios 3 and 4 only utilize $986,000 of freed-up levy funds due to use of franchise fees. These scenarios reallocated $645,000 of tax levy funds to other capital funds). As a result, the levy increase for Scenario 5 would be 5.54% or $7.96 more a month in property taxes. With franchise fees added, the monthly impact would be $13.96 for the median-valued homeowner. Scenario 6 has the same assumptions as Scenario 5 but does include receiving grant funding. The levy increase under Scenario 6 would be7.81% or $10.89 more a month in property taxes. With franchise fees added, the monthly impact would be $16.89 for the median-valued homeowner. Overall, an additional $475,000 will be added to the four right-of-way infrastructure funds using franchise fees. Below is a table showing the use of franchise fees and freed-up tax levy. Capital FundCurrent Revised Levy AmountFranchise FeesTotal Pavement Management Fund $ 1,120,000$- $ 1,360,000$ 1,360,000 Street Light Fund$ 21,000$- $ 96,000$ 96,000 Pathway and Parking Lot Fund$255,000 $- $365,000 $365,000 PW Equipment Fund$235,000 $- $285,000 $285,000 $ 1,631,000$- $ 2,106,000$ 2,106,000 Existing Levy to ROW Capital Funds$ 1,631,000 Levy Reallocated to Other Captial Funds$ - 0 Exiting Levy Funding Avaiable for Operational Budget$ It should be noted that Scenarios 5 and 6 do not provide tax levy to support four struggling capital funds(Police Vehicle and Equipment Fund, Fire Vehicle and Equipment Fund, Parks Vehicle and Equipment Fund, and the Park Improvement Fund) like Scenarios 3 and 4. These funds will need to be addressed as soon as the 2027 budget. The Police Vehicle and Equipment Fund will have a negative balance in 2027, the Fire Vehicle and Equipment Fund will have a negative balance in 2033, the Parks Vehicle and Equipment Fund in 2027, and the Park Improvement Fund will have a negative balance in 2032. Like Scenarios 3 and 4, Scenarios 5 and 6 include the use of franchise fees to help lower the tax levy and will be paid by homeowners, therefore franchise fees should be added to the total cost for the median-valued homeowner. As Scenarios 5 and 6 provide for more funding for capital funds using franchise fees, additional funding (tax levy) for capital funds should be added to the Scenarios 1 and 2 to ensure an accurate comparison to Scenarios 5 and 6. The table on the following page shows the monthly increase costs for each scenario, including the Finance Commission recommendation with direct comparisons highlighted in orange. It should be noted that if the public safety positions are added to budget and assuming adding additional capital funding that is not in the base budget, the use of franchise fees results in lower per month costs for the owner of the median-valued home in Roseville Page 3 Qbhf!213!pg!558