Laserfiche WebLink
<br />23 likely to be entitled to the approval. The City is, however, able to add conditions to a subdivision <br />24 approval to ensure that potential impacts on parks, schools, roads, storm sewers, and other public <br />25 infrastructure on and around the subject property are adequately addressed. Subdivisions may also be <br />26 modified to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare, and to provide for the orderly, <br />27 economic, and safe development of land, and to promote housing affordability for all levels. <br />28 <br />29 Public Hearing <br />30 The purpose of the public hearing for such an application is to consult the public; it is an opportunity for <br />31 the public to learn the relevant facts about the proposal, ask clarifying questions, and provide input <br />32 pertaining to the relevant facts as well as the analysis of the facts presented by City staff. <br />33 <br />34 Preliminary Plat Analysis <br />35 Detailed plans supporting the proposed plat are included with this RCA as Attachment 3. Roseville’s <br />36 Development Review Committee (DRC) met to review the proposed subdivision plans. Some of the <br />37 comments and feedback based on the DRC’s review of the application are included in the analysis <br />38 below, and the full comments offered in memos prepared by DRC members are included with this RCA <br />39 in Attachment 4. <br />40 <br />41 Proposed Lots <br />42 There are no minimum dimensional standards for lots in the MU-2B District. <br />43 <br />44 Setbacks <br />45 Building setbacks are not specifically reviewed and approved as part of a plat application, but the new <br />46 building footprints on proposed Lots 1 and 2 represented in the preliminary development plans appear <br />47 largely to conform to the form-based requirements of the Twin Lakes Regulating Plan. Any proposed <br />48 setback from the property boundaries must either conform to the standards or gain approval of a <br />49 variance to allow a nonconforming condition. <br />50 <br />51 Utilities and Storm Water <br />52 Unlike typical plat applications, submittal of a new storm water management plan was not necessary. As <br />53 part of an area that was subdivided via the Cleveland Club plat, an approved storm water management <br />54 plan that anticipates full commercial development of the site has been in place since 2015. The attached <br />55 memo from the City Engineer indicates: <br />56 Water and sanitary sewer service mains are available to the property. <br />57 The site can meet Roseville’s stormwater standards. <br />58 The storm sewer improvements within the site would be private and require private maintenance. <br />59 <br />60 Tree Preservation <br />61 Unlike typical plat applications, no tree preservation plan is necessary on this site because no trees are <br />62 present outside of the landscaped islands within the existing surface parking area. <br />63 <br />64 Park Dedication <br />65 Park dedication of $123,298 was required with the 2015 approval of the first Cleveland Club plat. City <br />66 records indicate that the payment was made. <br />67 <br />68 Public Comment <br />69 As of the time this RCA was drafted, Planning Division staff had not received any communication from <br />70 the public. <br />71 <br />72 Policy Objectives <br />73 Facilitate development and redevelopment of land consistent with the guidance of the future land <br />74 use plan. <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />Qbhf!:!pg!558 <br /> <br />