My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 10272025
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2025
>
CCP 10272025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/28/2025 3:33:18 PM
Creation date
10/28/2025 3:33:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
10/27/2025
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
189
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Date: 10/27/2025 <br />Item No.: 7.b. <br />Department ApprovalCity Manager Approval <br />Item Description:Consider Action Based on Parks and Recreation Commission <br />Recommendation Regarding Aldine St. Right of Way <br />1 <br />2 Background <br />3 At its July 21, 2025, meeting, the City Council received a petition to vacate the Right-of- <br />4 Way (ROW) located on Aldine Street between Ryan Street and Roselawn Avenue. Prior to <br />5 making a decision, the Council referred the issue to the Parks and Recreation Commission <br />6(PRC) to evaluate the ROW’s potential recreational value and alignment with the City’s <br />7 Parks and Recreation System Master Plan. <br />8 Over two meetings, August 7 and September 2, 2025, (Attachments 1 and 2), the PRC <br />9 heard public comment, toured the site, reviewed a tree inventory and topographic survey, <br />10 and discussed accessibility, cost, and tree preservation implications. In short, a preliminary <br />11 analysis arrived at the following conclusions: <br />12 There are 57 inventoried trees on site, of varying size, species desirability, and <br />13 quality (Attachment 3). <br />14 A topographical study was conducted by City staff (Attachment 4). <br />15 Tree preservation would likely be significantly improved through the installation of a <br />16 non-bituminous path and route selection that is at least partially based on trees, <br />17 compared to the originally proposed bituminous path. However, some removals may <br />18 still be necessary. Some risk of unintentional injury to trees due to grade change and <br />19 construction would exist, but could likely be mitigated based on construction <br />20 methodology, and not driving on or plowing the new natural pathway. <br />21 Any connective path would need to meet Public Right-of-Way Accessibility <br />22 Guidelines (PROWAG). These standards do not preclude the installation of a non- <br />23 bituminous path, but would likely require some grade changes. <br />24 Residents who live in the Mid Oaks neighborhood are currently outside of the "half- <br />25 mile walk to a park" goal that the City aspires to. The inclusion of the path reduces <br />26 their walking distance to Evergreen Park from .92 miles to .70 miles (from the <br />27 midpoint of the Mid-Oaks loop), but does not put them within that half-mile radius. <br />28 The detailed project cost cannot be known without a more comprehensive study, but <br />29 a more natural path would likely be significantly less expensive than the previously <br />30 quoted price for a hardscape pathway. <br />31 <br />32 A more detailed analysis can be found in the staff report from the September 2, 2025, <br />Page 1 of 3 <br />Qbhf!9!pg!29: <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.