My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 11242025
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2025
>
CCP 11242025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2025 1:30:52 PM
Creation date
12/2/2025 1:30:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
11/24/2025
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
273
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RCA Attachment 4 <br />wĻŭǒƌğƩ tƌğƓƓźƓŭ /ƚƒƒźƭƭźƚƓ aĻĻƷźƓŭ <br />aźƓǒƷĻƭ Α ĻķƓĻƭķğǤͲ bƚǝĻƒĬĻƩ ЎͲ ЋЉЋЎ <br />tğŭĻ Ќ <br />89 Ms. Thul expressed her concerns about water runoff and potential flooding from the <br />90 new development. <br />91 <br />92 Mr. Lloyd stated that the stormwater requirements would be handled to avoid <br />93 flooding. <br />94 <br />95 Ms. Thul inquired about the setback from her property and its effect on her land. <br />96 <br />97 Chair Bjorum clarified that the setbacks are more extensive than required by the <br />98 zoning code. <br />99 <br />100 Mr. Lloyd and Chair Bjorum assured Ms. Thul that the development would not shed <br />101 water onto her property and would meet stormwater regulations. <br />102 <br />103 Chair Bjorum ended the public hearing. <br />104 <br />105 Commission Deliberation <br />106 <br />107 The Commission discussed the requirement for two motions to approve the concept <br />108 and final plans. <br />109 <br />110 Member Aspnes confirmed that separate motions are needed for the concept and final <br />111 plans. <br />112 <br />113 MOTION <br />114 Member Aspnes moved, seconded by Member Lynch, to recommend to the City <br />115 Council approval of the proposed PUD Amendment Concept Plan to allow a <br />116 two-story townhome design to replace the approved one-story design, based on <br />117 the content of this RPCA, public input, and Planning Commission deliberation. <br />118 (PF25-010). <br />119 <br />120 Ayes: 6 <br />121 Nays: 0 <br />122 Motion carried. <br />123 <br />124 MOTION <br />125 Member Aspnes moved, seconded by Member Campbell Jensen, to recommend <br />126 to the City Council approval of the proposed PUD Amendment Final Plan to <br />127 allow a two-story townhome design to replace the approved one-story design, <br />128 based on the content of this RPCA, public input, and Planning Commission <br />129 deliberation. (PF25-010). <br />130 <br />131 Ayes: 6 <br />132 Nays: 0 <br />133 Motion carried. <br />134 <br />135 <br />Qbhf!2:3!pg!384 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.