26_0127_PWETC_Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

necessary since nearly all the drivers are local and they will be accustomed whatever sign you set permanent. 2) extend the north end to cover the entrance of the Keya park. That would provide a full dedicated safe pass to park goers -either walkers and bikers transition ingthrough this over - path area. Thanks for listening let me know if you wish more detailed thoughts! 8. Hello! Thank you for trying out a sidewalk in our neighborhood: increased safety measures are definitely appreciated, especially with the limited visibility when cars come over the hill. I do have a couple of questions: -Is there a reason why the sidewalk doesn't extend all the way down to the park's entrance path? I'm guessing there maybe restrictions with the fire hydrant, but it would be nice if the sidewalk connected all the way there. -I can't quite tell what the proposed change is at Brooks & Pascal: would there be a pedestrian crosswalk? 9. This is the most ridiculous waste of taxpayer money that I have seen in a l0000ng time! Absolutely rediculous! Have you actually attempted to walk in this fake sidewalk on Pascal Street? I highly doubt it! As is the bike lane on Hamline. I say this as an avid biker with 1200 miles pedaled since May. I will not bike in your sillytwo block bike lane. You've made the car lanes narrower and now cars are far more likelyto hit a bike. You've removed the turn lanes which causes a back up as well. Spend our tax money on something that really matters like reducing crime in Roseville. Get the beggars off the corners at Snelling and Cty B, which is far more dangerous. 10. Stopped bythe counter with concerns about the pilot project. -blocking their mailbox and feel theywon'tget mail -liming parking access to their property, lost parking spaces —questioning how itwill get plowed -did not get prior notice. 11. She is not happywith it. Areas are blocked off. It is narrow. Doesn't seem safe.You can't see coming up hill. 12. Hi there, I love the focus on safety in our neighborhood, thankyou. One concern I have: Much of the pedestrian traffic in this area is dogwalking and groups of residents walkingyear round. It's rare to go for an eveningwalk at anytime in the year without passing other pedestrians. So -how would these bollards or this new traffic pattern be cleared when there is snow? I'm concerned that itwon't get cleared or won't be adequately cleared for the groups and dogs who walk allwinter, pushing them into walking in a now narrower driving lane whenever there is snow cover, which is also when it is dark longer and so already more dangerous. I might also recommend Pascal and Brooks becoming a 4 way stop with the little flashers around the outside of the stop sign, as another idea for how to calm traffic in the area. 13. Hi, And while the intent for the addition of a pedestrian corridor along the hill in question is admirable, I believe --as a dailywalker in that area --that the current experiment is appallingly poor! The pedestrian corridor proposed on the east side of the street is MUCH too wide. I'm sure it's an attempt to make that short slope in the road safer for pedestrians. And -Yes --many of the south - bound cars coming over that hill are going much too fast. Unsurprisingly, south -bound drivers are often NOT at the very far western edge of their lane. That is, they are already a bit closer to the center of the road. And, of course, given the steep slope, those drivers can not see the north - coming cars coming up the hill. Forcing the north -bound cars into a narrower space seems a 3 Page 24 of 84