Laserfiche WebLink
recipe for disaster, given an already tight situation. While a pedestrian corridor might be a good <br />idea, its width should be MUCH narrower than the current demarcations. <br />14. Thanks for the mailer about the pilot project. I live adjacent on Brooks to Keya Park. Very happy <br />with the renovations to the playground last couple years! My only complaint would be put a <br />basketball hoop backup at the tennis courts!! Seriously, about the sidewalk markers, I get <br />they're temporary, but a sidewalk on Pascal would be excellent near the park. Are the markers on <br />Hamline, south of B2, temporary as well? If not, how does the city plan to plow the Hamline? I'm <br />about to retire, I love Roseville and I think RPW rocks. <br />15. As a resident of the Hamline/132 neighborhood, putting a sidewalk in this kind of neighborhood <br />would be actually diabolical and drive people out of this neighborhood. The theory of it actually be <br />useful, safe, practical and helpful, is politically a left leaning ideology that is not realistic in this <br />environment. Most of the neighborhood residents that do walk, walk on the edge of the grass or <br />the curb during daylight hours. You are correct that there are cars that will drive by quick in this <br />neighborhood, and that usually people that are not a resident of this neighborhood, and are <br />looking to instigate some kind of problem and cause commotion. I firmly believe that changing <br />this particular neighborhood to make it look more of a St. Paul neighborhood. Putting in sidewalks <br />would be a more of a detriment to the city of Roseville than any positive impact. Thankyou for <br />tryingto do better and making difference, but start with neighborhoods that are actually in need <br />of a sidewalk. <br />16. 1 would like to provide my feedback on the proposed Pascal Street sidewalk project. I have lived in <br />the Pocahontas/Keya Park neighborhood much of my life beginning in 1972. 1 was raised here, as <br />were my children, which is to say I have walked and driven through the neighborhood for many <br />years. I agree that the hill on Pascal is short, steep and notvisually clear for drivers, however I do <br />not feel the sidewalk is necessary nor a good safety strategy. For years I have walked through that <br />intersection, includingwith a stroller and with kids on bikes, and have felt safe bywalking near the <br />curb. The width of the proposed sidewalk causes cars to drive into the oncomingtraffic lane, both <br />on Brooks and Pascal. There isn't enough space for the sidewalk and two lanes of traffic. I <br />appreciate your allowingthe opportunityfor feedback on this project. <br />17. 1 am thrilled by the new reflective pylons making a walking lane over the blind hill. Now that people <br />are used to it, I see lots of people walking in that lane. Even better- nobody is parking in the No <br />Parking Zone because it is very clear with the pylons!! I have lived on Rose Place since 2013, and it <br />has been very frustrating to see how many cars park in the No Parking zone because they either <br />ignore the signs or just do not understand them. Cars even park right in front of the fire hydrant! I <br />am amazed that there are not constant accidents on the blind hill! I worry that narrowing the street <br />with curbs and a sidewalk may be beneficial to walkers, but make the blind hill very prone to car or <br />bike accidents, especiallywhen cars start parking in the No Parkingzone again. May I suggest <br />leaving the pylons in place, and adding a stop sign on Pascal at the Intersection with Brooks - only <br />on the side that is going on and up over the hill. Thatwould force cars to slow down before the hill. <br />As a former Safety Committe member at mywork, I was trained to look for the accident waiting to <br />happen. The blind hill on Pascal at Keya Park has definitely been a worry for me! <br />rd <br />Page 25 of 84 <br />