My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 02092026
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2026
>
CCP 02092026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2026 10:41:47 AM
Creation date
2/25/2026 10:41:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
2/9/2026
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PILOT PROJECT COMMENTS <br />1.I wondered what the delineators were for when installed at the corner of Pascal St/Brooks, then <br />received a postcard stating a pilot project to understand walking access to the park, formerly <br />known as Pocahontas Park. This makes no sense. How does this create a safer path to the park <br />when these are on two of the four corners of the intersection. People walk outside of these <br />delineators, not within them. Not everyone walks to the park from the same direction. How do <br />he corner of Pascal/Brooks, and have for 26 years. I see <br />no issue with walking to the park, and do NOT want any type of sidewalk installed. One of the <br />beauties of the neighborhood is that there are no sidewalks. Residents of the area enjoy walking in <br />the streets, with their dogs and neighbors, without sidewalks. The study that should be <br />complex at the deadend of Snelling Curve continue to speed up and down the <br />the hill by the park, racing through this intersection without regard for safety. And yes the majority <br />apartment parking lot and adjacent street. This is more of a safety concern. For as long as I have <br />been in my home here, there has been controversy about the speed on Pascal. Neighbors have <br />said they tried to get speed bumps installed, the City declined. They tried to get four-way stop <br />signs installed, the City declined. The speed has increased, the volume of cars has increased up <br />and down Pascal and nothing has been done to curb that. There are a number of families with <br />young children right at this corner, at least 15 to count. They as well as anyone walking in this area <br />are at risk of a confrontation with a speeding vehicle. Will it take an incident, accident or worse for <br />unnecessary study of a corner and should concentrate on a longer standing more problematic <br />issue. <br />2.My name is \[REDACTED\] and I am a resident of Pascal Street. My spouse and I have lived across <br />from the park for 6 years, and the hill approaching the park has always felt nerve wracking, as a <br />driver and as a pedestrian. There are a lot of children in the neighborhood who like to bike and play <br />3.I am against these white markers that you put on the street on Pascal. You’ve made it an obstacle <br />enough common sense and that these white markers are causing nothing but trouble. I feel the <br />same way about the markers that you put up on Hamline by the Cedarholm Golf course. It seems <br />like you’re removing valuable roadway. <br />4.Hi - <br />the proposed curbs on the southside. Two, really 4 of the temporary markers are insanely far out in <br />l. A permanent curb there on the south side of <br />northbound Pascal onto Brooks. It would be impossible to do if there was a vehicle westbound on <br />1 <br />Qbhf!49!pg!271 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.