My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 02092026
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2026
>
CCP 02092026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/25/2026 10:41:47 AM
Creation date
2/25/2026 10:41:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
2/9/2026
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
recipe for disaster, given an already tight situation. While a pedestrian corridor might be a good <br />idea, its width should be MUCH narrower than the current demarcations. <br />14. <br />t the sidewalk markers, I get <br />about to retire, I love Roseville and I think RPW rocks. <br />15. As a resident of the Hamline/B2 neighborhood, putting a sidewalk in this kind of neighborhood <br />would be actually diabolical and drive people out of this neighborhood. The theory of it actually be <br />useful, safe, practical and helpful, is politically a left leaning ideology that is not realistic in this <br />environment. Most of the neighborhood residents that do walk, walk on the edge of the grass or <br />the curb during daylight hours. You are correct that there are cars that will drive by quick in this <br />neighborhood, and that usually people that are not a resident of this neighborhood, and are <br />this particular neighborhood to make it look more of a St. Paul neighborhood. Putting in sidewalks <br />would be a more of a detriment to the city of Roseville than any positive impact. Thank you for <br />of a sidewalk. <br />16. I would like to provide my feedback on the proposed Pascal Street sidewalk project. I have lived in <br />were my children, which is to say I have walked and driven through the neighborhood for many <br />years. I agree that the hill on Pascal is short, steep and not visually clear for drivers, however I do <br />not feel the sidewalk is necessary nor a good safety strategy. For years I have walked through that <br />intersection, including with a stroller and with kids on bikes, and have felt safe by walking near the <br />appreciate your allowing the opportunity for feedback on this project. <br />17. <br />are used to it, I see lots of people walking in that lane. Even better- nobody is parking in the No <br />has been very frustrating to see how many cars park in the No Parking zone because they either <br />am amazed t <br />bike accidents, especially when cars start parking in the No Parking zone again. May I suggest <br />leaving the pylons in place, and adding a stop sign on Pascal at the Intersection with Brooks - only <br />on the side that is going on and up over the hill. That would force cars to slow down before the hill. <br />As a former Safety Committe member at my work, I was trained to look for the accident waiting to <br />4 <br />Qbhf!52!pg!271 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.