Laserfiche WebLink
STAKEHOLDER GROUP MEETING 2 MINUTES - ROSEVILLE CIVIC CAMPUS <br />FEBRUARY 12, 2026 <br />PAGE 2 <br />3) Modern finishes and the colonnade were also well received — important to balance classic <br />design/design that will age well with a modern take. <br />MOC: These facilities will be heavily driven by programming/vehicular circulation, but feedback is <br />needed to understand how the perimeter could be designed to better reflect community desires. <br />1) Path around stormwater in northwest corner of MOC parcel, connected to the park. <br />2) Ash trees along Lexington need to be removed due to their quality, outlook given Emerald Ash <br />Borer, and their location relative to the road (lower than sidewalk). <br />3) Aim for a diversity of species for vegetated buffers (deciduous and evergreen), prioritizing <br />native species and canopy trees. <br />4) Layered components with color and diversity — break up long walls. <br />5) Interest in the idea of a feature wall and highlighting certain areas with lighting. <br />6) Think about how this will feel in the winter months. <br />7) Concerns about gabion materials — industrial vibe and their maintenance considerations. <br />8) Consider lower cost options in less visible areas. <br />iii. Site: The parking lot should provide 140-160 stalls and serve the LPCDS, VFW, Veterans Park, <br />and a secondary driveway from the MOC. The park itself will need to have its own community <br />engagement process similar to other city park projects that would involve this level of intervention. <br />1) Make sure park amenities serve the neighbors to the north. <br />2) A target parking number has been reached by looking at current traffic being driven by the <br />license and passport center, the park, and the VFW by conducting daily counts over the past <br />several weeks and overlaying that observed data with city code requirements based on the <br />varying uses and what is allowed to be shared. <br />a) Accessible, electric charging, compact, etc. parking spaces have yet to be overlaid with <br />the parking layouts. <br />3) Not enough tree coverage in the park so it is very hot for soccer and other users, add shade. <br />4) The picnic plaza received the most positive feedback, and participants also proposed <br />community garden space and ways to reuse roof water from adjacent facilities for irrigation. <br />5) A medium or large -sized playground was also popular with participants. <br />6) Support for loop trail, memorial element, etc. <br />3. Next Steps <br />a. Proposed design solutions will be presented at the next meeting. <br />b. The scheduling of the next meeting will occur via email. <br />C. Materials from both Stakeholder Group meetings will be posted on the project website. <br />Page 90 of 105 <br />