Laserfiche WebLink
from T. Forman’s perspective, this claim appears to be an assumption unless supported by <br />statistical analysis. <br />T. Forman questioned the stated 85th percentile speed range of 22.6–24.9 mph for Pascal Street, <br />noting that, based on personal observation, vehicles frequently travel at speeds exceeding 30 <br />mph. Clarification was requested by T. Forman regarding whether the four-way stop is being <br />considered as a separate fourth option or as a modification of Option #3 that would include both <br />a sidewalk and a four-way stop. <br /> <br />T. Forman noted that there are currently no sidewalks throughout the neighborhood and stated <br />that this condition has been valued during 27 years of residency. T. Forman also questioned why <br />speeding concerns could not be addressed through enforcement rather than physical roadway <br />changes. Additionally, T. Forman requested that decision-makers who are unfamiliar with the <br />area drive the corridor to better understand existing conditions and why, in their opinion, the <br />addition of a short sidewalk segment would not address the stated concerns. <br /> <br />Staff responded to questions raised by community members regarding the proposed project <br />options. Staff explained that roadway narrowing, if pursued, would be funded through pavement <br />management funds, while the addition of a sidewalk would be funded through pathway funds. <br />Staff noted that the PWETC recommended a four-way stop option to the City Council. However, <br />staff clarified that they are not recommending the four-way stop option at this time. Staff also <br />noted that a four-way stop could be incorporated into any of the proposed options if directed. <br /> <br />The Commission asked about the use of speed bumps to address speeding concerns. Staff <br />responded that the City of Roseville does not utilize speed bumps, as they can cause vehicle <br />noise and vibration, require additional maintenance, and often result in only temporary speed <br />reduction, with drivers slowing briefly and then accelerating. <br /> <br />The Commission also asked about the justification for narrowing the roadway to reduce vehicle <br />speeds. Staff explained that current urban roadway design standards emphasize narrower road <br />widths as an effective traffic-calming strategy. Staff noted that historically, many Roseville roads <br />were built at widths of approximately 32 feet, while newer roadways are typically designed at <br />approximately 26 feet. Staff added that narrower roadways reduce maneuverability, which <br />generally results in lower vehicle speeds. <br /> <br />The Commission and staff discussed marked crosswalks and pavement markings, parking <br />located adjacent to the park rather than on the hill, connections to the proposed improvement, <br />and the recommended project options. <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br /> <br />