Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The Commission and staff discussed the public tree sale, including pricing, availability of <br />planting guidance, and whether outcomes of trees planted on private property are tracked. Chair <br />Matts-Benson noted the importance of communication efforts to engage younger residents and <br />encourage interest in trees and natural resources. <br /> <br />Additional discussion included invasive species such as jumping worms, historical tree removals, <br />the pace of ash tree replacement, and the types of native or near-native species being planted. <br />Staff noted that species are selected from the City’s approved tree list and that buckthorn <br />management continues to be a priority. <br /> <br />Commissioner Donaldson asked about the replacement of non-EAB trees removed due to age or <br />storm events. Staff noted that funding is available within the Park Improvement Program (PIP) <br />for tree replacement; however, due to the significant number of trees being planted through the <br />Accelerated EAB Program, not all removed trees are replaced immediately to ensure proper care <br />and establishment of newly planted trees. <br /> <br />Commissioner Penny suggested providing new Roseville homeowners with information on <br />available resources for maintaining and caring for trees on their property. <br /> <br />Staff concluded by noting that the City has been very fortunate to receive grant funding. Staff <br />emphasized that these awards are the result of strong support from the Commission, City <br />Council, and residents, and reflect the City’s demonstrated success as responsible stewards of <br />natural resources. <br /> <br /> Chair Matts-Benson noted that Commissioner Kooistra joined the meeting. <br /> <br />b) AUTUMN GROVE PLAYGROUND ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY AND REQUEST FOR <br />FEEDBACK <br />Staff provided an overview of the planned Capital Improvement Program (CIP) updates for <br />Autumn Grove Park, which include playground replacement, resurfacing of tennis courts, <br />amenity updates (including picnic tables), and the addition of new pathways. <br /> <br />Staff noted that a 2010 concept plan for the park was developed but was never implemented. As <br />part of the current process, staff is exploring the potential to broaden the scope of this project <br />beyond simple playground replacement to include modifications to the north parcel layout to <br />improve overall park cohesion and functionality, and the development of a preliminary master <br />plan for the south parcel to guide future decision-making. <br /> <br />Staff shared engagement themes gathered from the community, which indicated strong support <br />for replacing the playground, along with concerns about the current playground location related <br />4 <br /> <br /> <br />