My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2026-03-03_PR_Comm_Min
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Minutes
>
2026
>
2026-03-03_PR_Comm_Min
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/21/2026 5:17:03 PM
Creation date
4/21/2026 5:17:03 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />to safety, convenience, and proximity to the building. There was broad interest in relocating the <br />playground closer to the building, while also recognizing trade-offs associated with relocation. <br />Additional feedback included interest in preserving natural and unprogrammed spaces, support <br />for the bicycle pump track, and desire for additional walking trails or a defined walking loop. <br /> <br />Staff presented multiple concept options for the site, each with varying approaches to playground <br />location, pathway connections, and site layout. The Commission discussed the concepts in detail, <br />including considerations related to site use, preservation of ballfields, and potential elimination <br />of the hockey rink. <br /> <br />Staff reviewed a preliminary budget for the project and noted that some concepts include <br />additional amenities that are currently unfunded. Staff indicated that Park Dedication funds could <br />potentially be used to support these additional items. <br /> <br />Commissioner Harris asked why the hockey rink would need to be removed under certain <br />concepts if it is a movable feature. Staff responded that while lighting constraints could <br />potentially be addressed, the grading required for the rink would be too challenging to achieve. <br /> <br />Chair Matts-Benson expressed support for taking a broader approach to the project and stated <br />support for utilizing Park Dedication funds. Commissioners generally agreed that investing Park <br />Dedication funds in this unique park space would be appropriate. <br /> <br />The Commission discussed the future of the south parcel. Chair Matts-Benson emphasized the <br />importance of maintaining some non-programmed open space. Commissioner Boulton noted <br />community feedback suggesting the inclusion of workout equipment like what is available at <br />Central Park. Staff questioned whether there would be sufficient use to justify the cost of <br />workout equipment at a neighborhood park. <br /> <br />Staff noted that, based on feedback received, they plan to check in with the City Council <br />regarding a potentially broader scope for the project and that updates would be provided as the <br />project scope and budget are further refined. <br /> <br />Staff provided a general project timeline, noting that the playground is anticipated to be <br />completed in fall 2026, with pathways constructed in either 2026 or 2027, and overall project <br />completion anticipated in summer 2027. <br /> <br />Commissioner Harris asked about potential safety concerns related to pathway connections <br />leading into a potentially busier parking area. Staff acknowledged this concern and noted it will <br />be further evaluated. <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.