My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2026-0324 PWETC Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
202x
>
2026
>
2026-0324 PWETC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2026 12:43:58 PM
Creation date
5/13/2026 12:43:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
3/24/2026
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Freihammer next presented a Hamline Avenue segment between County <br />Road C2 and County Road D and recommended removing it as it is planned for <br />construction in 2026. <br />Mr. Freihammer then returned to the County Road C2 corridor, introducing a <br />segment between Lexington Avenue and Victoria Street. He described the <br />corridor as primarily residential with moderate traffic and noted nearby open <br />space and informal walking trails. He recommended modifying the description <br />to specify completing an off -road pathway along County Road C2 from <br />Lexington to Victoria He added that the 2028 Victoria Street improvements <br />would include pathways on both sides, further enhancing connectivity. The <br />Commission agreed to retain the segment with the modified description. <br />Member Brokaw Palalay asked about a remaining gap along County Road C2 <br />near Oasis Pond, noting that most of the corridor had already been discussed. <br />Mr. Freihammer clarified that the area was part of the previously discussed <br />segment west of Snelling and explained that the Twin Lakes Phase Two project <br />would include pathway connections through that area He noted that the project <br />would provide a connection, though not a direct one due to wetland constraints, <br />and could potentially be constructed as early as this year. <br />Member Brokaw Palalay acknowledged the clarification and indicated that it <br />addressed the remaining concern. <br />Mr. Freihammer then introduced another constellation link, identified as D1 <br />along Oxford Street between Woodhill Drive and County Road C2. He <br />explained that the intent was to connect neighborhood areas to nearby parks. <br />He noted that the area is a low -volume residential neighborhood and suggested <br />that people already have multiple routes to access the parks via existing streets. <br />Member Luongo indicated that he did not see a clear benefit to the proposed <br />connection. <br />Mr. Freihammer expressed uncertainty about selecting Oxford Street as the <br />preferred connection, noting that similar access could be achieved from <br />multiple nearby streets. He added that both parks are natural areas rather than <br />destination playgrounds, so there may be limited demand for direct travel <br />between them. <br />Chair Ficek asked whether the east -west connection at the bottom of the map <br />has already been constructed. <br />Mr. Freihammer confirmed that there is a sidewalk on the south side of <br />Woodhill Drive, providing the east -west connection. <br />Page 22 of 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.