My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2026-0324 PWETC Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
202x
>
2026
>
2026-0324 PWETC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2026 12:43:58 PM
Creation date
5/13/2026 12:43:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
3/24/2026
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Member Fergus questioned whether Oxford Street was selected because it <br />already had a sidewalk connection. <br />Mr. Freihammer explained that Oxford Street likely appeared in the plan <br />because it is centrally located in the neighborhood and may have been identified <br />as a logical connection at the time. He noted that a sidewalk now exists south <br />of Woodhill Drive along Oxford and suggested that the constellation link may <br />have been created before that sidewalk was constructed, which may reduce the <br />need for the proposed connection. <br />Chair Ficek, Member Luongo, and Mr. Freihammer discussed the east -west <br />connection and clarified that the sidewalk along the south side of Woodhill <br />Drive already provides a continuous connection from Lexington Avenue to <br />Victoria Street. <br />Mr. Freihammer explained that the remaining portion under consideration was <br />the north -south Oxford Street connection, originally identified as part of a <br />constellation link. He noted that because the east -west connection is already <br />complete and local streets provide adequate access, additional infrastructure <br />may not be necessary. <br />The Commission agreed that the Oxford Street connection did not warrant <br />inclusion as a formal pathway and supported its removal from the pathway <br />master plan, while allowing it to remain as a conceptual constellation link <br />within parks planning. <br />Mr. Freihammer then introduced segment 27, a Tamarack Park connection from <br />South McCarrons Boulevard. He explained that the area is served by low - <br />volume local streets and already has informal access into the park. The <br />Commission applied consistent reasoning used for similar segments and <br />supported removing both segment 27 and a related segment due to the limited <br />need for additional infrastructure on local roads. <br />Mr. Freihammer next presented a constellation link along Gregg Street <br />connecting Veterans Park to County Road C2. The discussion shifted to a <br />related proposed segment that would provide a direct connection to Veterans <br />Park from the north. The Commission expressed support for advancing that <br />proposed segment for further study and neighborhood engagement, while <br />removing the Gregg Street constellation link. <br />Mr. Freihammer then introduced a segment along Aldine Street near Roselawn <br />Avenue, noting that it has been the subject of recent resident input and is <br />currently under review by the Council and Parks Department. He explained that <br />a feasibility study is underway to evaluate a potential nature style pathway. <br />Given ongoing discussions and mixed resident feedback, the Commission <br />Page 23 of 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.