My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2026-0324 PWETC Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
202x
>
2026
>
2026-0324 PWETC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2026 12:43:58 PM
Creation date
5/13/2026 12:43:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
3/24/2026
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Freihammer noted that the Commission reviewed approximately 28 to 30 <br />segments and indicated that the next discussion would likely occur in July or <br />August due to a full meeting schedule. He encouraged members to submit <br />additional segment ideas if they believe anything is missing, explaining that <br />staff can add them for review and initiate the standard neighborhood <br />engagement process before bringing recommendations forward to the <br />Commission and Council. <br />Chair Ficek asked whether there are other right-of-way corridors in the city, <br />similar to Aldine, that could be considered for future pathway connections. <br />Mr. Freihammer explained that Aldine is a unique case, as most right-of-way <br />corridors have already been evaluated through a prior process that identified <br />potential vacations. He noted that some corridors were short or disconnected <br />and therefore not suitable for connecting pathways. He added that several <br />existing pathway connections into parks, such as Tamarack and Mattem, were <br />created using former right-of-way corridors. <br />Mr. Freihammer indicated that only a limited number of additional <br />opportunities remain, with a few still identified in the pathway master plan, <br />including some in the Owasso Hills area that may be reviewed in future <br />discussions. <br />5. Commission Direction on Member -Initiated Agenda Items <br />Mr. Freihammer provided an overview of upcoming Commission activities and <br />meeting topics. <br />Mr. Freihammer reported that anew Commission member, Luke Sandstrom, would <br />be sworn in at a future meeting and noted that he has prior city experience and <br />familiarity with the pathway master plan. He indicated that ethics training would <br />likely occur in early April. <br />Mr. Freihammer outlined upcoming agenda items, including the adoption of the <br />bike plan, a potential discussion of streetlight policy, continued review of the <br />pathway master plan, a Waste Management presentation in May, stormwater <br />updates, and preparation for the Joint Council meeting. He noted that the June <br />meeting would likely include a discussion on the climate equity action plan and a <br />leaf site recommendation, which may generate public interest. <br />Chair Ficek asked whether additional meetings would be needed to complete the <br />pathway master plan review. <br />Mr. Freihammer indicated there is no strict deadline and explained that the current <br />effort is intended to prepare for a larger transportation plan update expected to begin <br />in 2027. He noted that the Commission is making steady progress and could <br />continue at the current pace, with the option to add a special meeting if needed. <br />Page 27 of 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.