CC_Minutes_1961_0825 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-6- described therein and WHEREAS said Village Clerk has certified that he has examined and checked the petition and found the same to be in proper fonn and signed by 36.78% of the ownersof the property affected by the making of the improvement petitioned for; BE IT RESOLVED by the Village Council of the Village of Roseville~ Minnesota, as follows: 1.. That certain petition requesting the improvement of the following described territoy: Beginning at a point at the intersection of the extended N line of McCarron's Addition and the centerline of Western Avenue, being a distance of 400' S of the NE corner of the NW 1/4 of Sec 13, To 29, R. 23. Thence W along the N line of said McCarron t s Addition a di stance of 974.. 5 ft" $1 thence NLY a distance of 200 fto, thence WLY 260 ft.., thence SLY 200 ft.. to the N line of said McCarron's Addition, thence W along said N line to the NW corner of McCarron's Addition, thence SLY and SELY along WLY line of Blk 5 of said plat to centerline of No McCarron's Blvd., thence NELY along said centerline to a point of intersection of extended W line of Blk 6 of said plat, thence NLY along said \f line to N point of Lot 2 Blk 6, thence SELY along extended NELY line of Lot 2 Blk 6 to point of intersection 'With centerline of said N.. McCarron's Blvd., thence NELY along said centerline to intersection of Western Ave. center line$) thence NLY along centerline from said intersection to point of intersection of the SLY line of Lot 12 Blk 2 McCarron t s Addition extended, thence SWLY to the SW corner of Lot 12 Blk 2 of said.. McCarron's Addi tion, thence NLY along W line of Lot 12 thru 17 Blk 2 to SW co mer of Lot 1, thence ELY along extended S line of said Lot 1 Elk 2 to centerline of Western Ave.. j thence NLY to point of beginning filed with the Council on August 4, 1961 is hereby declared to be signed by the required percentage of owners of property affected thereby.. This declaration is made in conformity with M.S.. 429..035. 2. The petition is hereby referred to Banister Engineering Company.9 the village consulting engineers, and they are instructed to report to the Council with all convenient speed, advising the Council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection wit.h some other improvementj and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended. Reinecke Moved, Flanagan Seconded that Resolution No" 476 declaring a~equacy of a petition for a public water improvement$) and re~ ferring said petition to the consulting engineers for a feasibility report be adopted.. Roll Call$) Aye s (5) - Nays (0).. RESOLUTION NO. 475 ( CONT D Do ) RESOLUTIO N NO. 416