Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-2- <br /> <br />6) Our supply of ground .vater would be preserved for <br />commercial and industrial uses. This might make <br />Roseville more attractive to industry. <br /> <br />7) Costs of softened and iron-free water from each <br />supply were close enough that He felt that other <br />considerations mentioned above should decide the <br />is sue. <br /> <br />8) Softening of well water was considered necessary <br />since it was proven that out of pocket costs to the <br />consumer was less when the water was softened <br />municipally, than when it was softened on an individual <br />basis. <br /> <br />T~e Committee has answers to 15 of 17 points as outlined by the Council <br />and 'trill submit their recomrnendations on these questions along with a <br />detailed report to be submitted at a later date. The COIT~ittee stands <br />ready to meet with the Council at any time in the near future. The <br />roll call vote was as follows: Surface: Cullen, Frisch, Gearin, <br />Linebarger, Hotl, Schrenker and vJessel; Ground: Anderson, Herron, <br />Juen and Sander. <br /> <br />The following items have not been noted on and we believe they <br />require further study. <br /> <br />1) Should '"later be purchased from Hinneapolis or St. Paul? <br /> <br />2) The area to be included in the first improvement should <br />be re-studied in li~ht of additional information. <br /> <br />In conclusion, it is the unanimous wish of this cow~ittee to express <br />our appreciation for tho generous cooperation ,-ie have received from <br />all of the many authorities ,\Thorn 'tie have called upon for information. <br />In this connection, it should be noted that Banister Engineering Co. <br />has responded promptly and thoroughly to every request we have made <br />for information from them" The completeness and accuracy of the <br />Banister Engineering Company1s comprehensive report was of great <br />assistance to the conmuttee. <br /> <br />McGee Moved, Flanagan Seconded, tllat the Council accept the report <br />of the Roseville vlater Study Committee and that the Council <br />Committee of Hr. Flanagan, Hr. HcGee and Hr. Reinecke meet Hith <br />the 'i^Jater Study Committee on Honday, December 11, 1961, to <br />determine the approach to be folloHed on the rest of the problem. <br />Roll Call, Ayes (5) - Nays (0). <br /> <br />JOINT HE;ETING <br />VILLAGE <br />COUNCIL AND <br />"\IIATER <br />COI'-tIITTEE <br />