CC_Minutes_1962_1008 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Village of Roseville Regular r,leeting of the Village Council!) October 8,} 1962 e Village Councll met on the above date wi th the foHo\"in,g mernbers present Mayor McGee~ Trustees Goodrich" Kustermann and Schrcnkcr Trustee Flanagan absente The ~1ayor announced the meeting was opened for considerabon of a proposecl roacl improvement on Long Lake Road between County Road B 2 and County Road Co The Clerk produced an affidavit showing publication of the notice appearing on the improvement two weeks in the official newspaper of the Village. the last publication being the 20th day of September!) 19628 which affidav1t \"a5 examined and ordered placed on file The Clerk also produced a certIficate of mailing notices to all property owners of property lyinglvl th in the proposed improvement area" The proposed road improvement was explained to the indiVIduals present by the Village Engineer The substance of the presentation \vas as fo11O\v5 ~1rc Sautter explaIned that the proposed road improvement consisted of the construction of a 24 inch thick bituminous road surface 48 feet in width, The road would be straight except for a slight S curve at the railroad tracks, No additional rIght of way will be required Drainage south of the railroad tracks would be constructed so as to carry water to the south and then across what IS known as the lfurphy property, Drainage north of the railroad tracks would be carried north and Into the drainage system of Interstate HIghway 35 W The proposed financing of the road improvement was explained by the Vi Uage Clerk The substance of the presentation was as follow$ ~lr Turnlund stated that the overall improvement CO?!: was estimated at $137.246 02e. This included a construction cost r 121,)996 46 plus u 12 1/2 percent addition or $lSp249:56 for cngH1eerlng and overhead expenses The cost was to borne by the Village and abutting property mmers In accordance with a formula used in the construction of Walnut Street. another industrial road in the immediate area Under tIns formula the improvement construction cost would be divIded into fonr categories (1) the curb and gutter" (2) drainage facilities,) and (3) surfacing of the road, The curb and gutter would be asses,,,cd entirely to the abutting property; the drainage would be spIlt SO~ 50 betweon the Village and the abutting property; and (4) the 5\1rfacHll' would be SpIlt ~ one third to the Village and two~thlrds to the abutting property The overhead engineering costs would be assum)d by the Village, This would result in an estimated $15 96 per front foot asseSSment to abutting properties The property owners could amortIze this assessment over a 20 year period, Actual assessment figures would be presented at the assessment hearing, co p :1 PUBL Ii: f][ARINC LONG L\KE FO/\n IrlPIWVE~!ENT