CC_Minutes_1962_1008 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

.~3~ The following appeared in opposition of said improvement and the substance of the view presented by them was as follows~ Glenn Brand~ American Oil Company~ stated that his company would receive nObene-fItFrom the improvement and strongly opposed it He questioned the necessity of a 48 foot wide street, He also asked who had instigated the improvement, the property owners or the Village, lIe stated that if the Village considered this improvement desirable from the standpoint of expanding its industrial development, the Village should bear the cost He also complained that the property was the most tax burdened operation in his company and felt the operation was becoming an economic Impossibility in this locationo Winston Hunson~ Schirmer Transportation COT:1pany~ stated that the company lie wa.s-representing was definite Iy against the improvement 0 lIe stated that Schirmer Transportation felt that any additional taxes or assess~ ments would make the development of this property prohibitiveo He asked how much of the money involved in the construction would come from Hinnesota State Aid funds and whether access to Long Lake Road would be limited, I~ concluded by stating that the majority of the property owners abutting the property opposed the assessment" Harry Gustafson.. Prestressed Concretej stated the company he represented w-as . deffntteliagainst the improvement 0 W Po Norell. Ruan Transportationj) stated that his company definitely opposed lneimprovement Claude L Ray ~ Schirmer Transportationll stated that his company definitely opp~osea tneTmprovement 0 The following letters were received opposing said improvement' ~E~iJ~ tr~~n ~}~<?'l:'_g ':,,~!,,"~.! t~J:'l"l_e )',5_ .. ~(~ r . ~~a~_~=.:~_~l~." "'We are attorneys for Ruano Incorporated. the owner of the tract of real estate situated at the Southeast corner of County Road C and Long Lake Roadll the legal description of which tract is as follows That part of the northeast quarter (NEl/4) of Section 8. township 29 north!) range 23 westj) lying west of the west line of the east quarter (El/4) of saId northeast quarter (NEl/4)~ and lying north of the northerly line of right of way heretofore conveyed to Hinneapolis and St 0 Louis Railway (now occupied by Northern Pacific Railway) and lying east of a line parallel to and distant 33 feet east of a northerly projection of the line hereafter referred to as Line A; said Line A being determined as follows' Commencing at a point on the north line of said Section 8j) distant 934 feet east of the northwest corner of the northeast quarter (NEl/4) of said section; thence south parallel with the north and south quarter section line of said sectiong 508 feet to the northerly line of right of way of NPRR; thence northeast along the right of way of said railroadj) 267,,3 feet to the point of beginning of Line A; thence south along said Line A to the south line of the northeast quarter of said section 8 and to a pOInt which is 79805 feet west of the southwest corner of the east