Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The May~r ~nnc~nc2d that the meeting was open for the <br />consideration of objections, if any, to said proposed assess- <br /> <br />ment. All persons present were then given an opportunity to <br />present oral objections, and all written objections thereto- <br />fore filed with the Village Clerk were presented and considered, <br />and all such objections were tabulated as follows: <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Er2E~rty <br /> <br />NatQ:e of ObjectiQrr <br /> <br />MR. NICK VINCELLI, 3166 West Owasso Blvd.: Question concerning <br />a utility easement over his property. His neighbor, with no <br />access to the road, and with a larger piece of property, has a <br />smaller assessment. <br /> <br />MR. HAROLD C. EDSTROM, 3164 W. Owasso Blvd.: (Mr. Vincelli's <br />neighbor) Said he does have an easement to the public street <br />which covers everything. <br /> <br />MR. F. E. RUPRECHT, 1438 Talisman Curve: Charged 25 feet for <br />a rear lot assessment on County Road C and wanted to know why. <br />Was informed that this was a policy matter for the Council to <br />decide. <br /> <br />MR. C. PAUL HOFF, 970 W. Grandview: Objected to the 25 foot <br />corner assessment. He was also informed that this was a policy <br />matter for the Council to decide. Also felt that the $2.00 <br />per foot assessment to people formerly served by the Minnesota <br />Water Company was too low. <br /> <br />MRS. S. KVENILO, 2668 N. Pascal: Objected to the 25 foot corner <br />assessment. <br /> <br />MR. R. D. HERBST, 1426 Talisman Curve: Has the same 25 foot <br />rear lot assessment on County Road C as Mr. Ruprecht and objected <br />to it. Also submitted a list of names of neighbors who also <br />objected. They are MATH. IGEL, 1432 Talisman; R. A. LOSSIE, <br />1398 Talisman; L. W. FISHER, 1420 Talisman; ROY GESCHWIND, 1404 <br />Talisman; WA~~E L. HEIMAN, 1412 Talisman. <br /> <br />MRS. K. W. LACKEY, 2965 Arona, Trustee of CENTENNIAL METHODIST <br />CHURCH: On one of their parsonages (Sun Realty Centennial Terrace, <br />Lot 1, Block 2) the church was assessed for 105 feet but the water <br />main has only gone down 75 feet and then stopped. They ask that <br />they be assessed only for the 75 feet. On their main church <br />property where the buildings are located (discussion fairly <br />inaudible) they were assessed on County Road C-2 and also assessed <br />on Arona instead of the total number of feet on County Road C-2. <br />In view of this they felt the assessment was too high. <br />