CC_Minutes_1965_1007 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

The Mayor announced that the meeting was open for the consideration of objections, if any, to said proposed assessment. All persons present were then given an opportunity to present oral objections, and all written objections theretofore filed with the Village Clerk were presented and considered, and all such objections were tabulated as follows: Name ProDertv Nature of Ob1ectioq Wm. Ruff, 2866 North Griggs: lJanted to know if the per foot assessment figures remained the same as those anticipated at the time of the feasibility hearing. ~nald Johnson, 2775 Fernwood: Inquired as to what the $75 connection charge was for. He further stated that he had been connected to the Roseville Water Company and wanted to know if he would be assessed the $75 connection charge. Harold Schroeder, 2788 Fernwood: Wanted to know if the streets would be fixed and widened before the assessment is levied. Wm. Paterson, 966 Woodlynn: Asked if the cost of the water meter was included in his assessment. Identical written objections were received from George J. Reiling, Katherine ~ilin9, and Arthur Carrier to the effect that their properties will receive no benefit under the improvement, or, in the alternative, the amount of the assessment far exceeds any benefits that may be derived: that the assessments for install- ation of valves and lateral connections are excessive, of no benefit, and in numerous cases are duplieations. George aeiling, 2831 North Oxford: Asked that his written objec- tion be read. Then said that he wanted his objection to apply to all property served by the Roseville Water Company. an motion by Curley, seconded by Grauel, the hearing adjourned at 7:45 p.m.