Laserfiche WebLink
<br />All persons present were then given an opportunity to present <br /> <br />oral objections, and all written objections theretofore filed <br /> <br />with the Village Manager were pxesented and considered, and all <br /> <br />such objections were tabulated as follows: <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Property <br /> <br />Nature of Objections <br /> <br />MR. ZIl~ B. HATHAWAY, 1195 Josephine Road: His lot borders <br />on and drains directly into Lake Josephine. NO benefit is <br />derived from the storm seWer draining an area south and west of <br />this lot. <br /> <br />~ms. MARIE THOMAS, 1199 Josephine ROad: ~gistered the <br />same objection as Mr. Hathaway. No benefit fran the improvement. <br /> <br />MR. WILLIAM TURNER, 1201 Josephine Road: Has the same <br />situation as the two previous objectors. ais entire property <br />drains into the lake and there is no benefit from the improvement. <br /> <br />~lR. DAVID TILTON, 1211 Josephine Road: Has the same problem <br />in that his property drains to the lake. <br /> <br />MR. GARY BAR.RE.1"1', 1183 Josephine Road: Drainage from the <br />northern part of his property flows directly into the lake. <br />The crest of Josephine Road is west of the property causing the <br />drainage that goes to the street to flow eastward. <br /> <br />MR. ~CHAEL V. RICa, Representing E. H. Willmus properties <br />at 1360 and 1380 Terrace Drive: The extent of the benefits <br />received are less than indicated by the assessment. They believe <br />their drainage area is smaller than indicated. <br /> <br />MR. ROBER!' CARRIER, 2680 i~rth HaInline: <br />drains to the rear and no water runs into the <br />not contribute to the problem and, therefore, <br />no benefit. <br /> <br />His propert.y all <br />street. He does <br />feels there is <br /> <br />MR. WILLIAM SMIGLEWSKI, 1749 Koselawn Avenue: Drainage <br />all flows to the center of his lot and he's never had a problem. <br />as feels there is no benefit. Also asked what his assessment is. <br />