Laserfiche WebLink
<br />the drainage improv~nent. <br /> <br />MR. FRANK WITHN4, 2335 Fulham Street: Asked what his <br />assessment would be and also had a question about an easement in <br />connection with the improvement. <br /> <br />MR. PHILLIP \iOLTER, representing Tedesco Realty Company: <br />Parcel 200-29. Asked what the assessment was. <br /> <br />MR. THOt-tAB A. KELLER, attorney at law, Northwestern Bank <br />Building, Minneapolis, Minnesota, representing Williams Bros. Pipe <br />Line Company in connection with property identified as District 79, <br />Plat 0050, Parcel 02059. The address is 2451 West County Road C. <br />Objected to the proposed assessment on the basis that there is <br />no benefit. Alternatively, if it is benefited in any way they <br />would object on the grounds that the proposed assessment is in <br />excess of the benefit and that the entire area of the parcel is <br />not benefited - only certain parts are. He also said that the <br />area along the north boundary of the improvement along County <br />Road C and then upwards in triangular fashion is supposed to <br />embrace some ten and six hundredths acres of the Williams Bros. <br />property. They believe this is a miscalculation. The old drainage <br />ditch benefited their property but they receive no additional benefit <br />from the new improvement. <br /> <br />On motion made by Councilman Curley, seconded by Councilman <br /> <br />Shields, the hearing was continued to 8:00 o'clock p.m. on <br /> <br />October 14, 1968 at the Village Hall. <br />