My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_1972_0314
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
197x
>
1972
>
CC_Minutes_1972_0314
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 8:53:53 AM
Creation date
2/1/2005 1:07:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
3/14/1972
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />The Uayor then directed the Nanager to read the des- <br /> <br />cription of the general nature and estimated cost of the <br /> <br />proposed improvement and the area proposed to be assessed <br /> <br />therefor, as stated in the published notice of hearing. <br /> <br />After reading of the notice, all persons present were <br /> <br />afforded opportunity to be heard, and the names and addresses <br /> <br />of the persons appearing and heard by the Council, and the <br /> <br />substance of the views presented by them were as follows: <br /> <br />Improvement SS-70-1l, W-70-l2 and P-ST-70-13 <br /> <br />Village Manager Raymond presented a letter of last year <br />from Mr. T. M. Wi11mus objecting to some of the proposals made <br />at the hearing for this improvement last year. <br /> <br />r1R. T. M. WILLMUS, 3040 North Hamline: Owns about lS <br />acres of property in the improvement west of Fairview Avenue.. <br />Said his principal goal is to seek access into his property be- <br />cause they have plans to commence developing later this year. <br />"I do not feel that I need Prior Avenue at this time, nor do I <br />want to see other property owners in the area burdened with <br />assessments if their attitude is such that they do not need or <br />have a desire for these streets. I can get along with 600, 800 <br />feet of Oakcrest or 1000 feet, or I just want to get something <br />started in the area. I would, however, like to have a long <br />range idea of what is going to happen - if Prior Avenue, for <br />example, is not going to connect to County Road C, then I should <br />utilize that property and we should determine at this time if <br />I can build up to the line or within the limits of the line. <br />However, if there is a good chance that at some time in the <br />future Prior Avenue would be constructed north of Oakcrest <br />to County Road C then I should provide for it at this time, <br />but I feel we do have a substantial investment in this property <br />and it's the next piece that we'll be developing in Rosevi1le. <br />We would like to do it - have this access to the property in <br />the form of a public road rather than a private street.1I <br />Mayor Linebarger asked, "you're opposed to Prior Avenue but <br />you want Oakcr0st started?" Mr. Willmus: "I have a question <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.