My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_1972_0314
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
197x
>
1972
>
CC_Minutes_1972_0314
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 8:53:53 AM
Creation date
2/1/2005 1:07:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
3/14/1972
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />about the alignment there. This jog in the street, so to speak, <br />gives us some odd pieces of property to work with.. One of the <br />questions I was going to ask - this piece of storm sewer that's <br />going in 300 or 400 feet north of Oakcrest, going across, <br />wouldn't that serve just as well if it was put in the street <br />up there and eliminate that other line?" <br /> <br />MR. ELLIOT EXPLAINED, "It's located there because of the <br />topography continuing to drop to the north. We have checked the <br />storm sewer plans against those preliminary plans you have <br />furnished us and it seems to fit quite well with proposed park- <br />ing and I think it perhaps adds to the drainage plans in view <br />of your plans." <br /> <br />MR. WILLMUS: IIWe would probably start on the north side <br />of Oakcrest and go into a combination office - manufacturing type <br />building - keep the property out toward Fairview and on the <br />south side of Oakcrest - with the hope of a higher type develop- <br />ment. If the Beutow office building becomes a success we think <br />we have a good opportunity to construct an office building in <br />there too, but we have a different situation with the property <br />between ours and County Road C and the type of use that's in <br />there and I think it would be difficult to pull off an office <br />development with the north side of Oakcrest." <br /> <br />MR. RAYMOND: The record should probably show at that point <br />that the village petitioned the Public Service Commission for a <br />grade crossing at Prior Avenue over the railroad track in order <br />to reach County Road C and the Public Service Commission denied <br />our request without prejudice. <br /> <br />14R. B. J. LOFTSGAARDEN, representing Jell & Associates <br />who own the lO acres on the southwest corner of Oakcrest and <br />Prior: Asked if the assessment figures given include the cost <br />of land acquisition and if they include any reduction for state <br />aid. Asked to have the proposed storm sewer assessment re- <br />peated. <br /> <br />MR. VICTOR LAMETTI, representing Lametti and Sons: "I own <br />approximately 13 acres along Oakcrest and I am a little bit <br />concerned about some of the roads that surround us. I'm in <br />favor of this project but I also understand that I'll have about <br />a $lSO,OOO assessment against my property without any finance <br />charges. That means that someplace along the line I have to get <br />that revenue back. It seems to me we're building Oakcrest and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.