CC_Minutes_1972_0314 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

MR. WILLIAM CONLAS, 793 county Road C: Opposed to the 1mprovement. MR. ED SALVERDA, 646 West county Road C: Raised a question if mains were lowered whe'ther there would be any assessment. He was told that there would not be any assessment if thq were previously assessed In response to a que8~ion of where he s'tood on the project, he said "11m with the people and if they're for it, I'm for it". MR. HUBERTY, 2555 No. Victoria: Had a question .r.aguding What was going to be done with North V1ctoria. Mr. SDyker, a8s1stant9Ramsey County engineer, answered his questi_s by referring to a wall map and indJ.eated that the curvature would be reduced.. In response to Mr. Huber-ty' s qQest10n regard1nq stop and go lights, he answered that they were cOrl.a1dering them at Hamline, Lexington, Dale, Rice and Lakewood.. MR. JAMES BODSGARD, 720 West County Roact C (SpOke before): Raised a question regarding a through street. Mr. Snyker re- sponded. Mr. Goldberg then asked whether there would be signals at the railroad crossing and Mr. Snyker replied that there ~d be but the road had to be improved to do it. MR. ED SALVERDA, 646 West County Road C(Spoke before): Asked whether the village has approved the project. The .Mayoc indicated that was the purpose of the hearing and Councilman Curley indicated ~t since the county had already put in a bridge, a road was needed to hook up into the bridge. MR. HUBERTY, 2555 NO. Victoria: Asked if there would be allowances for canals under the road to the park. The answer given was that there would be a cattle pass culvert czoeated. There being no further discusston, the Mayor closed the hearing_ Councilman Grauel moved, seconded by CouncJ.lman Anderson that the matter be continued to the March 20, 1972 meeting of the Council. All in favor.