My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_1975_0210
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
197x
>
1975
>
CC_Minutes_1975_0210
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 8:55:43 AM
Creation date
2/1/2005 2:12:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/10/1975
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />MR. REILING: So we're paying part of the electric bill as <br />against other parts of the village. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN DEMOS: You're paying part of the cost of that <br />fancy light pole. Instead of an old wooden pole, you're going <br />to get a beautiful one. I would like to know how many other <br />people share Mr. Norqual's sentiment - who signed the petition <br />or asked to have their name deleted and who would be willing to <br />pay $10 or $11. <br /> <br />FROM TEE AUDIENCE: But after two or three years that could <br />be back up to $20 or $30 with inflation. <br /> <br />MAYOR LINEBARGER: But once we set the cost it would stay <br />the same. <br /> <br />FROM THE AUDIENCE: After 20 years they can start allover <br />again. <br /> <br />MAYOR LINEBARGER: I can't speak for the Council, but I <br />for one would take a look if this project was ordered at the time <br />the assessments were handled in the fall, I'd look long and hard <br />at the 2% figure and try to find something realistic and not <br />(inaudible) . <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN DEMOS: That $55 that is going to be applicable <br />(inaUdible) . <br /> <br />MAYOR LINEBARGER: (Inaudible) that's the way you worked <br />that out. Now, eight lights with inflation on the $67 catch as <br />catch can, am I correct? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: We put the full inflation on the whole thing <br />because our costs will be inflated the same way, but they would <br />still get credit for whatever we are paying on the other six <br />lights - whatever that fee may be. <br /> <br />MRS. DON NORQUAL, 532 Heinel Drive: Is that $23,000 a <br />10OO~ assessment? <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: As I interpret it, that's what the city would <br />have to pay over 20 years. <br /> <br />MRS. NORQUAL: And we would have no right to have any street <br />lights without paying for them ourselves, is that right? <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.