CC_Minutes_1977_0509 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

The storm ,:,ewl'='r SY4tem - I might sdd thai- once ?gain, since Shoreview is on the northern side, they would be paying half of the cost of the road. The ~torm ~ewer f2cilitieQ would be propo<3ed to pick up some drainage coming out of Shoreview from this new future road, come C'llong Avon wher0 it would head easterly to new proposed pond that will ~e discussed in a moment. Also, it will pick up the int~rs€ction drainage ct Avon and Brenner, down Brenner to Millw-:>od and out to the pond, picking up some drain~ge on the interior of these lots which are sort of (inaudible) back there according t') our prelirrin2ry calculC'tions. Also, 2 new line would re Duilt along Milh"'Jod, again where it would tie and g'J into the pond and again picking up a sm?ll amount of drain?ge in the interior or (inaudible) back yard locations. There is some exi~ting drainage that exists in this area. There1s 2 12 inch culvert that goes out underneath Owasso Boulevard. I ~ight cad that the ?rea you see in blue depicts what we feel. fr'Jm ? preliminary review are the lots that drain tow?rd this cct0rm facility and would be included in C'ny improvement costs. Tho"'e th?t ere 0vtside are not proposed to be csr;s8sed f-:>r,t.,rm dr?inage. This water would all be going i.O a new pond C't i-he end of the ~Jillwood cul-de- sac. You may see water laying aro, nd or - not in the low iE'reas, but the pond is pr':)posed to r.e dug, <"ctually lower than the ground is tod?y. We have discu3seo this with the park people. They would like toc;ee ? '"'tcmding water pond approximately five feet deep - really just for artistic and visual purp0ses. Just a nice thing to have around a Perk. In Centrel Park there is c. lerger pond. This pond would w0uld have five feet of water in it, aB mentioned previously, ~nd this 'tlould be shaped in a way that it would only be (inaudible) f':)ur slopeg f:>r safety purposes. It 1Joll')uld h~ve '" 10 foot flettened area AO people could walk around the pond and ob- serve it. There would be another six f00t area ~gain on a (in?udible) sl'ipe th?t would g0 up to the exi~ting - or to the prop:>sed gr'mnd elevation':>. The elevation",: IN'ould be somewhat higher: especi211y on the west and north c.ides, than they are now Lecau~e the excess !notarial from this project is proposed to be f"pre?d throughout the park area to enar.le the park t.o develop ~nd ne usar1e to 211 the residents in the area. At the present time it1s not very fecsible. There is also a long range proposal to get ~ome parking in this area 90 the pe':)ple would be 2ble to drive and us~ the f~cility rather than park if you I re at. the wrong end of t-he development. The pond is -4-