My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_1977_0509
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
197x
>
1977
>
CC_Minutes_1977_0509
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 8:57:17 AM
Creation date
2/1/2005 2:47:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/9/1977
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />MR. JAMES ROTH, 2992 North victoria: I would like to <br />reiterate the point regarding the storm sewer assessment. <br />I don1t believe we renefit fr0m the storm sewer. If <br />that deve10pment was not made, there1s no need for the storm <br />sewer in the area. The need is created by the pavement, the <br />driveways, the changes in soil characteristics - made by <br />developing lots and as such, is changing the drainage <br />characteristics behind our respective houses. That is <br />creating the need for the storm sewer and not by any action <br />that we have done with our lots. Therefore, I don't believe <br />the benefit is there. In addition, lId like to say that another <br />impact it will have on our lots is that it will decrease our <br />availability of our water supply because there will be more <br />users in the area. Pressures correspondingly drop when many <br />people are using the water Aupply and I feel that's another <br />point cgainst benefits to t.he people who live on Victoria <br />Street. <br /> <br />MARY USENIK, 2955 West Owasso Boulevard: I don't feel <br />that the road back of me would do me any good of any sort. <br />I also feel I would be highly assessed for something that would <br />be of no value to me. I feel that the storm sewer would also be <br />very costly <:'nd I had no information whatsoever of a hearing <br />before this one and my letter was dated April first and I <br />received it about April 15 which I thought was very late. <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: We did not have a hearing prior to this. <br /> <br />FROM THE AUDIENCE: I wrote a letter and you said you'd <br />h?ve this - <br /> <br />MAYOR DEMOS: It was not the hearing, but when we ordered <br />the feasibility stuay of Brenner and Owasso Boulevard. <br /> <br />MR. HONCHELL: I guess we interpreted that as being <br />presented at the last one and since the hearing was called <br />we didn1t receive another one- we assumed you would be here <br />to express your views. We did receive a letter but it was <br />before the tiMe of the fe2sibility study. <br /> <br />-11- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.