My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_1977_0509
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
197x
>
1977
>
CC_Minutes_1977_0509
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 8:57:17 AM
Creation date
2/1/2005 2:47:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/9/1977
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />MR. GEORGE REILING. 661 Heinel Drive: I have perhaps a <br />majority of the lots north of Brenner. Nineteen years ago I <br />was here when Shoreview presented to the Village Council of <br />Roseville a proposal to bring their sanitary sewer through <br />Roseville which would be Avon Street - getting into Brenner and <br />out on Owasso West. I was concerned, of course, because we <br />had a majority of the lots in that area and they could have <br />run their main on Victoria. However. it would be quite costly <br />to them and it would necessitate a lift station which I'd be <br />maintaining through the years. It was developed that they would <br />let Shoreviet'l1 come through this area at no cost to the City of <br />Roseville and at no cost to the people who have property on <br />that line except when and if it was used. That "when and if" <br />has never happened yet, but it will be happening, and I feel <br />that unless you reverse the original Council1s acceptance of <br />Shoreview1s proposal, there should be no charge to that sanitary <br />sewer running from County Road D to Owasso West. Shoreview <br />should - and I imagine it would be Shoreview - would obtain <br />commection fees at the time building permits were requested. <br />I think it1s still Shoreview's money. 11m not (inaudible) <br />to know whether Roseville bought that right from Shoreview, <br />but as it is. we pay Shoreview as we use those lots. <br />The next thing that bothers me is the pond. This plot WaS <br />plctted in 1947, and true. if it wasn't what a developer would <br />call a good plot - one more reason we didn1t want Shoreview to <br />corne through Avon. We felt we would re-plat and save those <br />long plats. However, that was spoiled once the sewer went through <br />Now, the pond was not on the original plat accepted by the <br />village in 1947. It W8S duly recorded, and all we're asking is <br />for the village to build the roads according to their specifi- <br />cations. The pond, I expect, is required by Rice Creek Water- <br />shed. I don't know why the pond should come into the <br />(inaudible) now. There always was good drainage down Avon <br />(inaudible) valley next to Avon and outletted to Lake Owasso <br />and we always had good drainage and much cheaper to construct <br />a storm sewer that would run into Lake Owasso. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN GRAUEL: I'd like you to explain something <br />on that sewer that comes down from County Road D and that <br />arrangement. <br /> <br />MR. REILING: 11m sure you have a record, because I was <br />vitally concerned, and the Shoreview attorney was present and <br />offered 2 written proposal of which the village had to accept <br />and pass on. You'll have to go back 15 years, but you'll have <br />a record on that proposal, and Shoreview may have a record. <br />11m sure they1re looking forward to pay something. <br /> <br />-12- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.